Ollohberdi (Writing 7.0)

John is the ultimate supportive friend—he’s always there for those in need. Whether it's offering practical help with a difficult project at work or simply providing a shoulder to lean on during tough times, he’s a constant source of encouragement. I’ve seen firsthand how his calm and reassuring presence can completely change someone’s outlook. For instance, when a close friend was going through a tough breakup, John didn’t just offer advice; he made sure to be there in person, giving that emotional support that people often need the most. His loyalty and empathy are truly remarkable.

1. Ultimate (C1) – The best or most significant; the highest or final point of something.
2. Supportive (B2) – Offering help, encouragement, or sympathy.
3. A shoulder to lean on (B2) – Someone who provides emotional support.
4. Constant source of encouragement (B2) – Always available and dependable for motivating or cheering someone up.
5. Reassuring presence (C1) – A calming or comforting feeling someone provides just by being there.
6. Completely change someone’s outlook (C1) – To significantly alter how someone views a situation.
7. Tough breakup (B2) – A difficult emotional separation between partners.
8. Offer advice (B1) – To give recommendations or suggestions.
9. Emotional support (B2) – Helping others manage their emotions, especially in difficult times.
10. Loyalty (C1) – A strong feeling of allegiance, faithfulness, or support.
11. Empathy (C1) – The ability to understand and share the feelings of others.

People have different views as to whether the government should invest in artists like musicians, painters, and poet or if it is a waste of financial resources. While spending on art can boost the local economy, I believe that this represents a misallocation of funds.

Proponents of government support for artists cite various reasons to support their stance. They assert that if governments allocate funds to artistic and cultural initiatives, they preserve historical monuments, indigenous crafts, and traditional practices in the form of art, thereby protecting cultural heritage from fading away. This, in turn, can enable future generations to experience and appreciate their history and traditions firsthand, strengthening national identity and pride. In a world dominated by cultural erosion due to globalization and modernization, investing in art can make a huge difference when it comes to survival and preserving a country’s unique identity.

Despite these arguments, I believe that investing in art is not a prudent use of public funds, especially in countries with poor public services. When governments support artists, such as painters and musicians, they often incur significant costs for specialized tools and mentorship, leaving fewer resources for critical public services like healthcare, education, and transportation. This budgetary constraint can limit opportunities to improve these essential services, ultimately reducing the overall quality of life. This issue is particularly detrimental in developing countries, where citizens already face challenges from inadequate public services and poor living conditions. Therefore, the government should allocate their funds to public services to boost happiness and satisfaction, both of which enhance public life.

In conclusion, although investing in art can provide reinforced cultural identity, I contend that this is a misallocation of funds as people still suffer from poor-quality public services. Only by allocating money to these services can we make significant strides in terms of improving public life.