The table compares the amounts of the forest area of six different continents, namely Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, and South America between 1990 and 2005. Units are measured in millions of hectares.
Overall, while the size of forests in Asia and Europe increased slightly, the reverse was true for the other continents, with their figures declining to varying degrees throughout the given period. It is also clear that Europe covered the largest forest area both in the initial and final years.
In 19990, Europe was the leading country in terms of occupying forest areas, with 989. Over the next 15 years, the amount of forest area in this continent increased steadily, climbing to 998 in 2000 and reaching a peak of 1001 in 2005. Similarly, the amount of forest area in Asia, starting with 576 in 1990, decreased to 570 in 2000. This figure then recovered and registered a considerable growth, finishing at 584 at the end of the period.
Focusing on the continents whose forest area saw a negligible downward trend, the forest occupied 708 million hectares in North America whereas Oceania had significantly smaller area of forest (199). Over the next decade, there were marginal declines in both regions, with the former decreasing to 705 and the latter to 198. Although North America maintained its previous figure by the end of the period, Oceania’s forest area again went down slightly to 197 in 2005.
Regarding the last two regions, the forest area covered 946 million hectares in South America – the second largest continent, this number was then followed by pronounced declines until 2005, dropping to 882 in the final year. Africa’s forest area stood at 749 in 1990, a figure that then decreased considerably to 709 in 2000 and 691 in 2005.
I cannot write better than this, or can I ?!