Posts filter


Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.

What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue.


In an era marked by a growing emphasis on globalization and industries, global warming has become a pressing issue on a large scale of the world. While there are clear driving factors behind this phenomenon, I believe that this problem can be addressed in various ways.

There are a variety of motives for global warming. With the advancements in the field of transportation and
internationalization, countries are trading with each other by using different transport options like ships, cargo aircraft, and trucks. A recent study shows that the major contributor to global warming is transportation. When those types of vehicles are used for exchanging situations, they are likely to generate carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases, which can wreak havoc on the global temperature of the world. Of equal great contributor to global warming is manufacturing factories. They require a great amount of energy consumption to produce their products. By consuming excessive amounts of energy, factories often derived from fossil fuels, leading to high carbon emissions.

There are various ways in which the problem of global warming can be addressed. Nations should try to improve vehicle efficiency, including the promotion of electric vehicles and hybrid transports. The more eco-friendly vehicles countries use, the less contribution they can make to global warming. From a governmental perspective, it is essential for government bodies to set clear boundaries for manufacturing fabrics. This can be accomplished by imposing strict limits, high fines, and lengthy prison sentences on those who are not eco-friendly. Without the implementation of these measures, global warming can worsen and create serious climate-related issues.

In conclusion, global warming can be attributed to international exchanges and some factories, however, I think that it can tackled by using eco-friendly vehicles and setting limits for eco-harmful fabrics.

#dailyessay


Some people believe that education should focus on
preparing students for employment, while others think it
should focus on personal development. Discuss both views
and give your opinion


People have differing views on whether educational institutions should prioritize employment skills over fostering personal development among young people. While there are clear benefits to enhancing personality, I believe that education should more pay attention to employment abilities.

Proponents of preference for improving personal skills through education cite various reasons to support their stance. If young individuals are equipped with critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and adaptability in their academic places, they are likely to navigate the complexity of life with ease. When children have those valuable skills, they can make sound decisions both academically and personally thereby achieving their aspirations and living in the desired lifestyle. Gone are the days when young people were not provided with quality education, as today's advancements in the field of education enable them to receive successful personalities.

Despite the personal benefits, education services should prioritize teaching more employment-related skills like leadership, teamwork, and dedication. In a competitive job market, most employment companies are seeking workers equipped with interpersonal skills since the more skillful employees are, the more successful companies can be. Beyond these advantages, employment institutions can improve social mobility among young people, enabling them to engage in their careers and enhance their overall quality of life. In a world where economic recession is occurring at an alarming rate, knowledgeable workers can make a big difference in terms of equality and prosperity.

In conclusion, even though focusing on improving personal development among children offers some benefits, I think educational institutions should prepare youngsters for their professional life.

#dailyessay


Many young people’s choice of future jobs is based on salary. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?


With the economic recession and rising living costs, it has become increasingly common for many young individuals to seek well-paid jobs, especially in urban areas. While working in high-salary jobs offers several drawbacks, I believe that its advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Working in lucrative jobs brings some drawbacks especially viewed through the lens of employment rate. When most younger look for only well-paid jobs, there will be a decline in the rate of blue-collar work like construction, transportation, and manufacturing. Without the workforce of young people, these kinds of industrial jobs could be unable to run their businesses. Another disadvantage is the unemployment level. Governments can find it difficult to provide all young people with lucrative jobs, particularly in the city centers. As the unemployment rate increases, so does juvenile delinquency among the young generation. Therefore, the desire for high-salary jobs among young people could be at a disadvantage.

That being said, the advantages of providing well-paid jobs to the young are far more significant. If the largest number of young people have lucrative works, they could make more money and improve their life conditions thereby enhancing the overall quality of life. By living a better life, they can feel a sense of personal fulfillment and satisfaction, immerse themselves in their jobs, and unleash their work potential.
Another benefit of having a well-paid job among teenagers, it can diminish the rate of young criminal activities. Yet the highest number of juvenile delinquents is conducted because of poverty and low income. By offering high-salary jobs, governments might solve the problem and reach young crime-free societies.

In conclusion, even though the wish of young people to find a good salary job brings some drawbacks, I think it can improve the overall life quality and decrease youth crime.

#dailyessay


Not bad


The best way to protect the environment is to use local resources, such as food or building materials rather than transporting resources from other places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?


With globalization and the advancements in the field of transportation, people have different views on whether countries obtain resources from domestic manufacturers rather than trading them with other countries to improve environmental sustainability. While there are clear benefits to making trades globally, I believe that countries should supply themselves with local products.

The global transaction offers some benefits especially when viewed through the lens of various resources. If countries trade products with each other, they have the opportunity to purchase widely thereby fulfilling people’s requests. Some food and building products may not be available in some nations, in this case, trading globally allows them to find their desired items.

That being said, making the transaction on a global scale can wreak havoc on environmental sustainability. When countries trade globally, they are forced to use different transportation services like ships and cargo aircraft. These kinds of vehicles can generate toxic gas emissions which can advert effect on the environment. In a world where environmental issues are occurring at an alarming rate, making transactions Internationally could worsen the environment.

In conclusion, although International trades provide some advantages in terms of a variety of choices, I believe that countries should prioritize the environment and encourage local manufacturers.

#dailyessay


The first bar chart illustrates how much money was earned by three different music institutions, including music publishing, live music, and recommend music and the second chart gives information on the number of employees who worked for these sectors in the UK between 2013 and 2015. Units are measured in $millions and numbers

Overall, while the most amount of income came from Live music in all the years in question, the least income contributor among music industries was Music publishing.

Concerning total revenue by sectors, in 2013, more than 800 million came from Live music, closely followed by Recommended music with 600 million and music publishing. A year later, Live Music increased its yearly revenue to 1000 million dollars, and the figures for Recommended Music and Music publishing were about 700 million and 420 million respectively. In 2015, the yearly earnings of Live music were twice as much revenue as Music Publishing. Recommended Music, by contrast, accounted for 600 million of all income in that year.

In terms of employee distribution, Live Music began with 25000 workers in 2013 Before decreasing to 25000 employees in 2015, this figure rose slightly the year of 2014. Recommended Music, by contrast, started with about 7000 workers. After increasing to approximately 8000 employees in 2014, the number of workers in this sector leveled in the final year. Nearly 2000 employees worked in Music publishing in 2013, and then the figure saw a decreasing trend in the number of workers until reached out 1000 employees in 2015.

#dailyreport


Mistakes are proof I’m trying 😊


Some schoolchildren dislike learning maths.

What might be the reasons for this?
What might be the best ways to make learning maths enjoyable for schoolchildren?


With the rise in the complexity of school subjects and social changes, it has become increasingly common for children to become reluctant to learn math, especially in urban areas. While there are clear reasons behind the issue, I believe that parents and teachers play a crucial role to address it.

Why are children refusing to learn mathematics? Children do not see the importance of learning mathematics. They often make mistakes while solving mathematical problems. When they make a mistake, children become frustrated and overwhelmed, thereby diminishing their motivation to engage in math classes. Given these circumstances, it comes as no surprise that children do not want to participate in math and do not take this subject seriously. Gone are the days when children were obsessed with algebra as today's world creates an environment where young people feel reluctant to learn math.

That being said, parents and teachers can put the fun back into math. If teachers encourage their students to excel in extracurricular algebra activities, children could be motivated to learn math deeply. By participating in these kinds of additional courses, can children find it easy to solve their math problems and empower their problem-solving skills. After extra courses, parents should assist their children in doing homework. They can motivate their children by playing number-involved games, like cards, board games, and sudoku. In a world where numbers are a crucial part of our lives, learning math can make a big difference in terms of financial management.

In conclusion, although there are clear motives for ignoring learning math among children, parents and teachers can turn math into an interesting subject.

#dailyessay


The pie charts give information about the screen time of various activities on smartphones and tablets alike. Units are measured in percentages.

Overall, in both devices, the most amount of time spent is dedicated to games, the opposite is true for news. Of particular note is social networking activities, which on smartphones the percentage of screen time for this activity nearly doubled compared to the tablets.

Concerning time spent on smartphones, games make up 35% of all time spent, while social networking activities account for 29%. A fifth proportion of all screen time is spent on utilities, the figure for music and videos is 8%. The least amount of time is dedicated to news which is 3%.

In terms of tablets, more than half of the proportion of screen time is spent on games, followed by social networking with 15%. The time spent on social networking and other activities is 13% and 8% respectively. The least favorite activity on tablets is utilities, which only 3% of time spent is dedicated to it.

#dailyreport


Some people believe that the government should invest in art while others argue that it is a waste of money.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion


People have different views on whether the government should allocate money to art projects or if supporting art is poor budgeting. While enhancing art projects is beneficial in terms of boosting tourism, I believe that governing bodies should prioritize other essential services.

Proponents of investing in art cite various reasons to support their stance. If governments allocate more money to developing art projects, whether it be music, street art, or museums, they can increase the influx of tourists. By increasing the tourism rate, governments can boost their economic conditions. A case in point is the country of South Korea, where millions of teenagers visit here to watch BTS concert, one of the best-known POP group.

That being said, attracting individuals through art projects can wreak havoc on the local environment. When tourists visit cultural institutions, they can bring about damaging effects on environmental pollution. Many tourists generate excessive waste, such as plastic bottles, food packaging, and other disposable items, which can lead to land and water pollution. Therefore, tourism has detrimental effects on the country which holds arts projects.

Funding could be better granted to more pressing social services like education. Governing bodies should more focus on improving educational institutions over art projects. By improving the educational system, governments can enhance the overall life of their citizens. The more intelligent people are, the more lucrative jobs they can find, thereby making more money and living in better life.

In conclusion, in my opinion, funding art systems is not as significant as education even though it can increase the tourism industry.

#dailyessay


The bar chart compares six parts of the world where their citizens migrate to Australia in 1987 and 1997. Units are measured in numbers. ( I’m not sure )

Overall, in both years, the highest number of migrants came from Europe, the opposite was true for North/South America. Of particular note is Europe where nearly a third of all migrants came from this place in 1987.

In terms of migration to Australia in 1987, Europeans took the lead with 30 people, closely followed by the Rest of Asia, with nearly 22 migrants. Interestingly, an equal number of people (15) who lived in the Middle East Africa, and North East Asia migrated to Australia in the year of 1987. North/South America was a place where only about 6 citizens came to Australia this year.

Concerning the migration rate that occurred in 1997, like in 1987, the highest number of migrants who visited Australia was Europeans with approximately 27 people in 1997, the figures for North East Asia and Oceania were about 24 and 22 migrants respectively. A fifth of migrants came from the Middle East Africa, whereas about 17 people visited from the Rest of Asia. In 1997, still, the lowest number of migrants came from the North/South America, with 5 migrants.

#dailyreport


Video is unavailable for watching
Show in Telegram
🇺🇿


📝 TASK 2: It is important to give children the chance to act independently and make their own decisions from early age.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea?

The question of 22.03.2025


People have different views as to whether children should be allowed to make their own decisions from a young age. While there are clear benefits to this view associated with independence, I believe that parents and teachers should help them to improve their decision-making skills.

Why is it advantageous to let children make their own decisions from childhood? If young people are allowed to settle on a choice, they can feel empowered and confident, which could be valuable skills in their academic and professional lives. By letting children make decisions, parents can take responsibility for their children and their consequences. In a world where many people struggle with great decision-making skills, allowing children from an early age to reach a decision can big difference in terms of improving their confidence and authority.

That being said, permitting youngsters to make their own decisions can be detrimental especially when viewed through the lens of poor time management. When children are permitted in terms of decisions, they are likely to indulge in their whims and make wrong judgments. In other words, young people gravitate towards spending their precious time in mindless activities, whether it be playing immersive video games or watching binge-watching TV shows, thereby diminishing their academic performance and overall life. Parents and teachers should be guided to develop good decision-making abilities by giving advice and planning their time.

In conclusion, although allowing children to make decisions in their early life is beneficial in terms of boosting self-esteem, I believe that parents and teachers play a critical role in developing this skill.


Video is unavailable for watching
Show in Telegram


Dear weather don’t be so romantic, as we are fasting)


Nearly 7 hours were dedicated to IELTS preparation in last two days


Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished the same way as adults.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?


People have different views as to whether juvenile delinquency should be punished as strictly as adults. While implementing harsh penalties could reduce the number of young crime activities
I believe that strict punitive measures are not the best option.

Proponents of introducing harsh penalties cite various reasons to support their stance. If younger criminals are punished strictly, they are likely to experience feelings of regret and avoid doing criminal activity for the rest of their lives. In this way, the rate of youth crime can decrease, and societies can reach youth-crime-free communities. In a world where juvenile delinquency is at an alarming rate, imposing harsh penalties could make a big difference in terms of the rate of youth crime.


The table compares various food products that were eaten by a person in a week in an unspecified European country in the years 1992, 2002, and 2012. Units are measured in grams.

Overall, vegetables were the most favorite food among the food choices all over the years in question, the reverse was true for Cheese.

With respect to the most preferred food products, in 1992, 2140 grams of vegetables were eaten weekly, and meat followed closely with 1148 grams. By 2002, weekly eating vegetables had increased to 2190 grams, and the figure for meat was 1211 grams. At the end of the given period, consuming vegetable and meat products was 2220 and 1132 respectively.

In terms of less favored weekly food products, wheat and bean started with 837 and 532 grams in turn. After which eating wheat experienced a double increase in 2012, while consuming bean saw slight growth at 546 grams. In terms of cheese consumption, it began with 113 grams, after a decade consuming Cheese rose to 125 grams and remained unchanged in 2012

#byme


Forward from: Aziza’s diary🕊️
Video is unavailable for watching
Show in Telegram
🥹


It also enables people to learn new languages when they’re sleeping.

Imagine your child takes his or her all day to sleep while simultaneously learning English 🗽

20 last posts shown.