#EssaybyMe
Some countries have introduced laws to limit the working hours that an employer can ask from an employee.
Why are these laws introduced?
Is this a positive or negative development?
Several nations have legislated against CEOs demanding their staff to work overtime. The exploitive nature of job market has called for such laws and I believe that the benefits for society and staff overshadow the drawbacks for employers.
The potent reason for the introduction of the regulations concerning working hours has to do with the prevention of staff exploitation. Down the centuries when such laws restricting office hours were absent, employers used to take advantage of their employees, making them work for even 12 or 16 hours daily. Due to the total authority of managers over their staff, the latter run the risk of dismissal from a job in case of an opposition. The enforcement of laws to legally monitor people’s working hours, though, has enabled to do away with this unfairness.
As for the implications of rules implemented by countries to regulate working hours, the productivity at work is at stake here. That is, when employers have no means of asking their employees to work overtime to accomplish their tasks within a set deadline, the company may lag behind its set goals. Similarly, the trend entails net negatives for employers as they often have to hire extra staff to take late shifts. In a 24/7 operating shop, for example, the post of a salesperson should be taken by at least three staff due to the restrictions on working hours, creating excessive costs for employers.
Nevertheless, the overall effect of this limitation is positive at large. Despite companies and directors suffering, such laws are of immense asset to society and staff. On a private level, employees gain most from the restriction on their office hours. Not only can they strike work-family balance, but they may also enjoy more leisure time activities. These possibilities for employees are decidedly favorable as they will be less likely to suffer from work-related stress. On top of this, societies are bound to become more egalitarian,ensuring the rights of all layers are reserved. This will undoubtedly improve social cohesion and structure with more families gaining satisfaction and contentment from their lives.
To conclude, the laws to restrict working hours have been enacted to allow for equitable and convenient work setting. Although these rules can work against the interests of managers and companies, the positives for employees and societies are overwhelmingly superior.
⚡️ @aplusacademyielts ⚡️
Some countries have introduced laws to limit the working hours that an employer can ask from an employee.
Why are these laws introduced?
Is this a positive or negative development?
Several nations have legislated against CEOs demanding their staff to work overtime. The exploitive nature of job market has called for such laws and I believe that the benefits for society and staff overshadow the drawbacks for employers.
The potent reason for the introduction of the regulations concerning working hours has to do with the prevention of staff exploitation. Down the centuries when such laws restricting office hours were absent, employers used to take advantage of their employees, making them work for even 12 or 16 hours daily. Due to the total authority of managers over their staff, the latter run the risk of dismissal from a job in case of an opposition. The enforcement of laws to legally monitor people’s working hours, though, has enabled to do away with this unfairness.
As for the implications of rules implemented by countries to regulate working hours, the productivity at work is at stake here. That is, when employers have no means of asking their employees to work overtime to accomplish their tasks within a set deadline, the company may lag behind its set goals. Similarly, the trend entails net negatives for employers as they often have to hire extra staff to take late shifts. In a 24/7 operating shop, for example, the post of a salesperson should be taken by at least three staff due to the restrictions on working hours, creating excessive costs for employers.
Nevertheless, the overall effect of this limitation is positive at large. Despite companies and directors suffering, such laws are of immense asset to society and staff. On a private level, employees gain most from the restriction on their office hours. Not only can they strike work-family balance, but they may also enjoy more leisure time activities. These possibilities for employees are decidedly favorable as they will be less likely to suffer from work-related stress. On top of this, societies are bound to become more egalitarian,ensuring the rights of all layers are reserved. This will undoubtedly improve social cohesion and structure with more families gaining satisfaction and contentment from their lives.
To conclude, the laws to restrict working hours have been enacted to allow for equitable and convenient work setting. Although these rules can work against the interests of managers and companies, the positives for employees and societies are overwhelmingly superior.
⚡️ @aplusacademyielts ⚡️