Akhmadali Turgunov || Blog

People say success is the best revenge.

Nah, Revenge is the best revenge.

Why do we fall?...
So that we can learn to pick ourselves up.

“Hey, don’t you think you wanna settle down… Don’t you think you’re living life too fast... Don’t you think the business is getting too big?”

Your friends and family are NOT bad people for saying these things.

They are just very threatened by what you decided to do and the conviction that you are living in.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits.

Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.


Equality of opportunities and equality of outcomes are often pitted against each other. Some believe that the latter framework enables greater personal achievement, while others, including myself, argue that capitalist equality provides superior conditions for individual success.

On one hand, proponents of an egalitarian society emphasize two key merits of such a system. Firstly, historical and contemporary communist societies, like the Soviet Union and China, have endeavored to dismantle social, educational, and economic barriers for their citizens. In these countries, people enjoyed equal access to education and economic opportunities, in stark contrast to capitalist nations where the accumulation of wealth takes precedence, leading to inevitable social inequalities. It is asserted that individuals have more equitable chances of prospering within the former social structure. Another argument in favor of communism is the presence of social safety nets that provide a safety cushion in case of setbacks in one's pursuits. Unlike capitalism, where recovering from financial failures is often unlikely, wealth is evenly distributed among the public in a communist system, mitigating risks associated with entrepreneurial endeavors.

On the other hand, I firmly believe that a merit-based social structure enhances individual success more effectively. To begin with, individuals living in such a society are motivated to excel and achieve. The level of income or fame a person attains is directly proportional to their work performance and diligence, which serves as a more powerful incentive compared to being leveled down to the average achievements of the wider society. Moreover, individuals in a capitalist society bear greater accountability than their counterparts in a communist one. When success or failure rests squarely on one's shoulders, individuals are compelled to assume greater responsibility for their future and, consequently, strive harder to attain competence. This contrasts sharply with how communists approach their personal and professional lives, often relying on community support and exhibiting a sense of complacency.

In conclusion, both socio-economic structures under consideration have their merits. Nevertheless, the prospect of personalized incentives and a heightened sense of responsibility in life, I firmly believe, renders capitalism a superior system.

I will also be mentor in this challenge,

I hope you can learn and improve a lot from this cause!

#sample

The pie charts show changes in the percentages of main reasons for teenagers using their phone in one African country from 2016 to 2019. Overall, teenagers primarily used their phones for social media throughout the period, distantly followed by communication purposes like emailing and for phone calls, and lastly, a digital camera.

The main two reasons for teenagers using their phones were social networks and emailing, albeit with a large disparity in the percentage points between the two. In 2016, the figure for the former made up 50%, while the figure for the latter accounted for a quarter. However, emailing fell out of popularity over the years, with its figure declining to 19% in the final year. In contrast, teenagers using their phones to scroll on social media increased slightly, reaching a chart high of 56%.

Regarding the remaining reasons, 10% of teenagers used their phone to make phone calls in 2016, while 15% of those used the digital camera. Interestingly, these figures had reverse patterns, with teenagers using their phone to make phone calls decreasing to 5%, while the number for the digital camera went up, constituting 20% in the final year.

#sample

#task1

The bar chart shows changes in the percentage of women and men passing their driving tests, in one Asian country between 1980 and 2010.

Overall, while women consistently exhibited higher percentages of passing the driving test, men showed little lower numbers when compared. Notably, the figures for both men and women increased gradually throughout the period, albeit to varying degrees.

The percentage of women passing their driving tests accounted for just below 50% in 1980, a figure that then increased to a chart high of approximately 70% in 2000, making women more successful at acing the test then men. However, in 2010, this figure decreased to about 65% - still higher passing rate compared to men.

Men, on the other hand, showed lower passing percentage in the driving tests despite having an increasing pattern in its figures. Starting at nearly 30%, the share of men passing driving tests grew to roughly 50% in 2000, and stayed relatively stable until 2010.

#task2

Around the globe, it is becoming increasingly prevalent that many adults tend to work remotely, and children are also studying from the convenience of their homes due to the technological advancement, which facilitated cheap and easy access. I believe this is a change for the better for two main reasons.

Firstly, a primary advantage is the ability to save energy and money. Working or studying at home spares individuals from an unnecessary hustle compared to working and studying traditionally, which requires commuting from home to workplaces and institutions and takes up both energy and resources if transportation is used. Once people are free from going back and forth to their work or study place, they can have more time to better focus on their tasks, thereby improving their productivity.

Another, less subtle yet significant, positive about remote working and studying is the greater flexibility. After having done with work and studies, individuals can engage in meaningful activities, such as hobbies, with their family members, allowing them to have a better work-life balance. When individuals spend more time with their family, their satisfaction levels will be boosted. While people may not have the chance to interact with their colleagues and peers more effectively, just like in a traditional way, having quality time to be with family can be more fulfilling for many.

In conclusion, development in the field of technology has enabled us to work and study from home. This switch is a positive development as it enables individuals to save energy and resources and allows substantial flexibility.