Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There is a view that people living in the 21st century have too many choices. Generally, this is true since globalization has transformed most parts of the world economically, providing people with more opportunities. However, considering the differences in political systems in certain countries and the rising wealth inequality, it can be deduced that some people do not have as many options as others.

Globalization has made the world more connected than ever before, allowing nations to cooperate economically. This process includes open borders and increased migration, meaning moving from one place to another is not as restricted as it was decades ago. In fact, some countries offer dual citizenship and do not require a visa for entry. Economically, corporations can now open new branches in different parts of the world, offering locals a range of products. In my native Uzbekistan, there are already multiple branches of popular brands such as Nike, Costa Coffee, KFC, and Papa John's, to name a few. It is worth mentioning that these brands employ locals, meaning they create jobs.

With regard to the most important decisions people can make, most of them definitely have a wider variety to choose from. In education, for instance, students can now choose from up to or over a hundred institutions, depending on the major they want to pursue—an opportunity that was not available to many of our ancestors. Technology-wise, there is an unprecedented number of gadgets one could buy, often causing decision fatigue. Even in the world of entertainment, there seems to be too much diversity, with thousands of musicians and movies available to keep people entertained on a regular basis.

Nevertheless, it would be an overstatement to claim that the entire world enjoys a life full of choices. Politically, there are major differences in certain parts of the world, with North Korea being an example of a state adhering to communism. It is often reported that North Koreans cannot travel outside their country, meaning they have limited freedoms. This example suggests that people’s increasing or decreasing number of options depends on the political framework of their country.

Another factor to highlight is the widening gap between the rich and the poor. It is rational to believe that one’s options are as large as one's budget, but in some parts of the world, poor people are becoming poorer. This may be considered a consequence of capitalism or the officials’ inability to sustain the country economically. Either way, the truth is that a certain proportion of people do not have the resources to enjoy a variety of choices.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the majority of the world’s population now has access to a larger number of options, ranging from making decisions related to education and travel to entertainment and shopping. Yet, "majority" does not mean "all," as millions of people lack the freedom and financial means to afford many choices.

484 words.

Approximate evaluation: 9/9/8/8 🖥

#EssayByMe 🆕

@ieltsaidbydilshodbek 🗣