As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With more and more cars on the roads, road networks require a greater investment. While it is sometimes considered that this should be funded by the state, I believe that drivers should incur all the expenses associated with this.
From one perspective, it is not difficult to see why the government is seen as responsible for maintaining existing roads and funding further developments. This is because the ultimate role of any government is to improve the lives of its citizens, and the road is an essential infrastructure for any country. People from all walks of life use roads to reach their destinations safely and quickly, and businesses rely on roads to deliver their products. Hence, requiring that the government pay for roads might be justifiable.
However, financing road systems with public funds is unfair to users of public transport and the poor. First, road networks are dominated by private cars, which serve only a fraction of the whole population. Although users of public transport also use roads, the majority of road expenses stem from the use of cars. Wider roads and improved road systems, therefore, mainly benefit drivers of those private vehicles. Even more important is the fact that drivers tend to come from relatively affluent backgrounds, so spending taxpayers' money for this cause would mean that the working class families pay for a better life for middle or high-income people. Thus, only car owners should cover the costs associated with roads.
In conclusion, although the government is responsible for the welfare of its people, only drivers should pay for roads. In addition to charging the primary users of roads, such a policy would also ensure that the poor do not pay taxes that mainly serve the wealthy.
#task2 #writing #duringtheclass
288 words
@dilmurod_notes
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With more and more cars on the roads, road networks require a greater investment. While it is sometimes considered that this should be funded by the state, I believe that drivers should incur all the expenses associated with this.
From one perspective, it is not difficult to see why the government is seen as responsible for maintaining existing roads and funding further developments. This is because the ultimate role of any government is to improve the lives of its citizens, and the road is an essential infrastructure for any country. People from all walks of life use roads to reach their destinations safely and quickly, and businesses rely on roads to deliver their products. Hence, requiring that the government pay for roads might be justifiable.
However, financing road systems with public funds is unfair to users of public transport and the poor. First, road networks are dominated by private cars, which serve only a fraction of the whole population. Although users of public transport also use roads, the majority of road expenses stem from the use of cars. Wider roads and improved road systems, therefore, mainly benefit drivers of those private vehicles. Even more important is the fact that drivers tend to come from relatively affluent backgrounds, so spending taxpayers' money for this cause would mean that the working class families pay for a better life for middle or high-income people. Thus, only car owners should cover the costs associated with roads.
In conclusion, although the government is responsible for the welfare of its people, only drivers should pay for roads. In addition to charging the primary users of roads, such a policy would also ensure that the poor do not pay taxes that mainly serve the wealthy.
#task2 #writing #duringtheclass
288 words
@dilmurod_notes