#EssaybyMe
Globalization is positive for economies but its negative sides should not be ignored.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The argument over the overall effect of internalization revolves around whether economic justifications pale in comparison to associated risks. In my opinion, though globalization promises financial prosperity in the short term, its long-term repercussions are more severe for both economies and cultures.
Admittedly, globalization can be a boon to worldwide economies. That is, many businesses operating across borders not only create employment opportunities for local people but also pay significant taxes, benefitting local economies. Many Southern nations, say, China can be an infallible testimony to the benefits of allowing for foreign enterprise as the country has so far enjoyed a hike in GDP and better living standards for its citizens. Furthermore, this trend is bound to trigger competition in local markets, enabling people enjoy better quality products at a reasonable cost. In case of car manufacturing in my country, the intrusion of foreign brands into local market has driven General Motors, a monopolist producer, to enhance its models and reduce the prices so as to compete with other manufacturers.
However profitable globalization may appear, its economic upsides alone warrant a closer scrutiny. Despite bringing cash flow to a nation, it may also trigger the bankruptcy of local businesses. By way of example, restaurant chains, say, McDonalds and KFC have taken over fast-food markets in developing parts of the world, building brand loyalty among customers. This allegedly leaves local restaurants with no alternative but to close down and declare bankruptcy due to losing the market to high-street names. On top of this, globalization threatens local cultures, introducing elements of alien traditions, clothing styles and manners. For instance, the more a person is exposed to Hollywood films, the more they are likely to imitate and copy Western culture, as exemplified with the disappearance of Indian sari in favor of suits in traditional ceremonies.
To conclude, I admit that customers and local economies stand to gain from globalization. That said, the trend poses economic ramifications for local businesses and cultures in the long run, hence the drawbacks weighing more in importance.
⚡️ @aplusacademyielts ⚡️
Globalization is positive for economies but its negative sides should not be ignored.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The argument over the overall effect of internalization revolves around whether economic justifications pale in comparison to associated risks. In my opinion, though globalization promises financial prosperity in the short term, its long-term repercussions are more severe for both economies and cultures.
Admittedly, globalization can be a boon to worldwide economies. That is, many businesses operating across borders not only create employment opportunities for local people but also pay significant taxes, benefitting local economies. Many Southern nations, say, China can be an infallible testimony to the benefits of allowing for foreign enterprise as the country has so far enjoyed a hike in GDP and better living standards for its citizens. Furthermore, this trend is bound to trigger competition in local markets, enabling people enjoy better quality products at a reasonable cost. In case of car manufacturing in my country, the intrusion of foreign brands into local market has driven General Motors, a monopolist producer, to enhance its models and reduce the prices so as to compete with other manufacturers.
However profitable globalization may appear, its economic upsides alone warrant a closer scrutiny. Despite bringing cash flow to a nation, it may also trigger the bankruptcy of local businesses. By way of example, restaurant chains, say, McDonalds and KFC have taken over fast-food markets in developing parts of the world, building brand loyalty among customers. This allegedly leaves local restaurants with no alternative but to close down and declare bankruptcy due to losing the market to high-street names. On top of this, globalization threatens local cultures, introducing elements of alien traditions, clothing styles and manners. For instance, the more a person is exposed to Hollywood films, the more they are likely to imitate and copy Western culture, as exemplified with the disappearance of Indian sari in favor of suits in traditional ceremonies.
To conclude, I admit that customers and local economies stand to gain from globalization. That said, the trend poses economic ramifications for local businesses and cultures in the long run, hence the drawbacks weighing more in importance.
⚡️ @aplusacademyielts ⚡️