Discussion essay:
Many people believe that safe investments are better for their long-term future while others feel there is more value in risky investments.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Some argue that investments should prioritize stability and guaranteed returns, while others claim that riskier ventures offer greater potential rewards. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why I support the preference for safer investments in the long term.
On the one hand, investing in newly established businesses carries significant risks. The likelihood of such companies achieving commercial success is relatively low. However, if they do succeed, investors can earn substantial returns. For instance, the Chinese smartphone manufacturer Tecno initially faced skepticism, yet those who invested early saw their capital grow by over 250%. Nevertheless, for every company that thrives, many others fail to gain traction, causing investors to suffer considerable financial losses.
On the other hand, investing in well-established enterprises is a far safer option, even if the returns are relatively modest. Large corporations such as Sony and Philips have operated successfully for decades, making them reliable investment choices. While the profit margin from such ventures may be lower, the risk of financial loss is minimal. For this reason, I agree with those who advocate for stability in investments. Instead of relying on speculation, individuals should take financial security and sustainable growth into account.
To conclude, while investing in emerging businesses can be highly profitable, it carries a substantial risk of failure. In contrast, safer investments provide consistent, long-term benefits. Therefore, I believe that prioritizing stable and well-established ventures is the wiser approach for securing financial success.
@ieltsboyko
Many people believe that safe investments are better for their long-term future while others feel there is more value in risky investments.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Some argue that investments should prioritize stability and guaranteed returns, while others claim that riskier ventures offer greater potential rewards. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why I support the preference for safer investments in the long term.
On the one hand, investing in newly established businesses carries significant risks. The likelihood of such companies achieving commercial success is relatively low. However, if they do succeed, investors can earn substantial returns. For instance, the Chinese smartphone manufacturer Tecno initially faced skepticism, yet those who invested early saw their capital grow by over 250%. Nevertheless, for every company that thrives, many others fail to gain traction, causing investors to suffer considerable financial losses.
On the other hand, investing in well-established enterprises is a far safer option, even if the returns are relatively modest. Large corporations such as Sony and Philips have operated successfully for decades, making them reliable investment choices. While the profit margin from such ventures may be lower, the risk of financial loss is minimal. For this reason, I agree with those who advocate for stability in investments. Instead of relying on speculation, individuals should take financial security and sustainable growth into account.
To conclude, while investing in emerging businesses can be highly profitable, it carries a substantial risk of failure. In contrast, safer investments provide consistent, long-term benefits. Therefore, I believe that prioritizing stable and well-established ventures is the wiser approach for securing financial success.
@ieltsboyko