As the world's population grows more and more, the need for houses increases daily. As a result, most recreational areas may be given to other sectors to develop more residential areas, businesses, or economies despite the value the public gives them. In my opinion, governments should prioritize the preservation of public parks to accommodate the needs of a growing population while exploring alternative methods instead of restricting those areas for several reasons.
Admittedly, activity centers can yield numerous benefits for society. The prime factor is ecological and health-related benefits. To be precise, public parks are always surrounded by greenery, which produces oxygen and provides fresh air. Since these places are often cleaned and various types of trees are planted, the atmosphere is better. Therefore, most people occasionally visit there to rest or escape from the hectic pace of life. This, in turn, helps individuals release their stress and anxiety, leading to a healthier lifestyle. For example, Central Park, located in the US, is a global symbol of urban green spaces and has been featured in countless movies, TV shows, and cultural works, making it instantly recognizable. According to some statistics, it encourages thousands of people to keep fit regularly.
As simple as it sounds, countries had better find other ways to alleviate the issue with residential zones without harming the green space. One of these effective ways is vertical housing. In this way, houses are built upwards. It not only accommodates more people within the same land area, making it ideal for densely populated cities, but the price is also lower. Moreover, it also includes shared amenities like gyms, parks, and community spaces within the building, enhancing residents' quality of life. As an example, China is the leading country in using this method to accommodate their nearly one and a half billion population. The Pearl River Tower is a sustainable skyscraper that incorporates energy-efficient technologies; and it includes houses apartments, offices, and recreational spaces.
In conclusion, while many people appreciate the value of public parks, some believe these spaces could be repurposed for residential developments to address the growing population or for businesses to stimulate economic growth. However, in my view, governments should focus on preserving public parks to meet the needs of a growing population while seeking alternative solutions instead of limiting these green spaces.
Admittedly, activity centers can yield numerous benefits for society. The prime factor is ecological and health-related benefits. To be precise, public parks are always surrounded by greenery, which produces oxygen and provides fresh air. Since these places are often cleaned and various types of trees are planted, the atmosphere is better. Therefore, most people occasionally visit there to rest or escape from the hectic pace of life. This, in turn, helps individuals release their stress and anxiety, leading to a healthier lifestyle. For example, Central Park, located in the US, is a global symbol of urban green spaces and has been featured in countless movies, TV shows, and cultural works, making it instantly recognizable. According to some statistics, it encourages thousands of people to keep fit regularly.
As simple as it sounds, countries had better find other ways to alleviate the issue with residential zones without harming the green space. One of these effective ways is vertical housing. In this way, houses are built upwards. It not only accommodates more people within the same land area, making it ideal for densely populated cities, but the price is also lower. Moreover, it also includes shared amenities like gyms, parks, and community spaces within the building, enhancing residents' quality of life. As an example, China is the leading country in using this method to accommodate their nearly one and a half billion population. The Pearl River Tower is a sustainable skyscraper that incorporates energy-efficient technologies; and it includes houses apartments, offices, and recreational spaces.
In conclusion, while many people appreciate the value of public parks, some believe these spaces could be repurposed for residential developments to address the growing population or for businesses to stimulate economic growth. However, in my view, governments should focus on preserving public parks to meet the needs of a growing population while seeking alternative solutions instead of limiting these green spaces.