Qalandarov A.


Channel's geo and language: Uzbekistan, English
Category: Blogs


Presidential school in Khiva ’23
Presidential University ’27
— Economics
— AI
— Automation
— Data Analytics
— Vague Philosophy
Newsletter: qalandarov.substack.com

Related channels

Channel's geo and language
Uzbekistan, English
Category
Blogs
Statistics
Posts filter


Wisconsin put the last red pin


over?


Forward from: Venture with Love
#RDF

TechBro ларни кўпида Reality Distortion Field бор, ўзларига воқеликни мослаб олаябди.

@VentureWithLove


I asked for strength, and God gave me dificulties to make me strong.
I asked for courage and God gave me dangers to overcome.
I asked for wisdom and God gave me problems to solve.
I asked for love and God gave me troubled people to help.

My prayers were answered.

source: Paths of meaning


Watching this 2nd time and still getting new value and insights.

When I observe those who've achieved goals similar to mine, makes me question my interests. I find myself questioning my aspirations, particularly when it comes to material success. Will achieving these goals truly bring fulfillment? Am I chasing what genuinely matters to me?

The real value in studying successful people lies in their battle-tested wisdom. These individuals have:
🟢 Navigated the exact path you're considering
🟢 Experienced both ups and downs
🟢 Reached the point you're currently aiming from below.

Their reflections serve as a preview of possible futures. By learning from their journeys, you can make more informed decisions about your own path. Sometimes, their stories might reveal that certain goals aren't aligned with your values or wouldn't bring the satisfaction you imagine.

This kind of learning is perhaps one of life's greatest shortcuts. Instead of spending years discovering every lesson firsthand, you can gain valuable insights from those who've already walked the path.

Learning someone's life reflections = Living their life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LURMUksRu60


Forward from: Khumoyun Suyunov
Two hundred years ago, the youth from Pushkin's generation generally avoided speaking Russian. During that era, Russian language was not deemed suitable for engaging in friendly conversations on diverse topics. Young nobles and elites primarily learned French, as it was the language spoken by both their parents and their tutors. While Russian was solely used by peasants, it existed only in dialectal forms, not as a literary language. The esteemed Russian writer and poet, Alexander Pushkin, masterfully crafted a language that merged the vibrancy of casual dialogue, the grandeur of hymns, and the precision of expression. Since Pushkin's linguistic contributions, the Russian language has been embraced universally across Russia and beyond.

Fast forward to today, what we see is that entire languages - vibrant, distinct tongues - being willingly swapped for the dull sheen of dominant language. And not because it's better or more beautiful, no! Simply because it’s “convenient” which is the great excuse for linguistic laziness. People have inherited such a colonial mindset that they take pride in speaking the language of their colonizers, thinking it makes them sound cool, worldly even. Spoiler: It doesn’t. Let me remind you: the very first, most distinctive feature of any culture is its language. Without it, the essence of identity begins to fade, leaving behind a cheap imitation, so don't be walking advertisements for cultural erasure.

P.S. And, ironically enough, this entire post was written in English.

@pursuit_of_truth


Accepting few more people: https://t.me/+Vk8CYFMyUfxlZWYy




🤔




Uzum is unicorn for a reason.

It is not the result of occupying most of the market but rather how they earned it.

Today, I visited their headquarters and witnessed how competent they are in e-commerce. Learned about how they collect and analyze their data.

[ A unicorn company is a privately-owned startup company that has a valuation of over $1 billion and is not listed on a stock market ]


The state in the 21st century

Yesterday, I attended the lecture of 2014 Economics Nobel Laureate, Jean Tirole. He received the prize for his contributions to the study of monopolistic industries, or industries that consist of only a few powerful firms.

During the lecture, he discussed a variety of topics, including markets, economic efficiency, societal regulations, etc. For me, the most spectacular one was his speech about the Modern state.

He emphasized what governments should be and shouldn't be doing and focusing on in the 21st century. J. Tirole continued his speech with the characteristics of dysfunctional states and "time boms"(consequences of short-termism).

Overall, it was another great experience. This lecture was part of the Central Asia Universities forum. You may also join some of the public lectures organized by our school.




5+1 Habits from Marcus Aurelius

Credits go to The Daily Stoic




“No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.”

— Heraclitus


Everything is constantly changing, so even if you return to a seemingly identical situation, it will be different because both you and the circumstances around you have changed, just like the water in a river is always flowing and never the same. 




Creative monopolists

Tolstoy opens Anna Karenina by observing: “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” Business is the opposite. All happy companies are different: each one earns a monopoly by solving a unique problem. All failed companies are the same: they failed to escape competition.

Creative monopolists give customers more choices by adding entirely new categories of abundance to the world. Creative monopolies aren’t just good for the rest of society; they’re powerful engines for making it better.

Even the government knows this: that’s why one of its departments works hard to create monopolies (by granting patents to new inventions) even though another part hunts them down (by prosecuting antitrust cases). It’s possible to question whether anyone should really be awarded a legally enforceable monopoly simply for having been the first to think of something like a mobile software design. But it’s clear that something like Apple’s monopoly profits from designing, producing, and marketing the iPhone were the reward for creating greater abundance, not artificial scarcity: customers were happy to finally have the choice of paying high prices to get a smartphone that actually works.

Monopolies drive progress because the promise of years or even decades of monopoly profits provides a powerful incentive to innovate. Then monopolies can keep innovating because profits enable them to make the long-term plans and to finance the ambitious research projects that firms locked in competition can’t dream of.

— Peter Thiel


«Все счастливые семьи похожи друг на друга, каждая несчастливая семья несчастлива по-своему»

—  Лев Толстой



20 last posts shown.