I have two groups - 116 and 216 - which I will take as examples to make a point now.
When I taught 116, I felt like I wasn't enough - in other words, students were passive and I attributed this inactiveness to my teaching skills, underestimating myself as a result.
HOWEVER, on even days, I conducted lessons for 216 when I used the same ppt and materials. The lessons were virutally always fucking awesome. Engaging. Student-centred. Fun. Informative.
This goes to underline the influence that the audince has to dictate how the lesson will be.
When I taught 116, I felt like I wasn't enough - in other words, students were passive and I attributed this inactiveness to my teaching skills, underestimating myself as a result.
HOWEVER, on even days, I conducted lessons for 216 when I used the same ppt and materials. The lessons were virutally always fucking awesome. Engaging. Student-centred. Fun. Informative.
This goes to underline the influence that the audince has to dictate how the lesson will be.