Some people believe that history books are becoming unnecessary since their role is being replaced by films and TV shows. While this view matters to some extent, I believe that printed books are likely to last for a longer period as an irreplaceable tool in learning the past.

In general, learning history has become easier and more convenient after the advent of films and various shows about the past. With the help of these visual materials, many people, especially young learners in schools, are able to gain valuable knowledge about historical events with minimal effort. In other words, they can simply catch the meaning of all necessary information in a video format without spending much time instead of feeling bored after reading textual materials for hours. A clear example is the historical movie “Lincoln”, which vividly portrays Abraham Lincoln’s life allowing students to spend less time in libraries reading multiple books about him.

However, I believe that books remain valuable in learning history. For example, they provide readers with more accurate information about the past events unlike films, which may distort historical facts. This is because books are carefully analyzed before being published to ensure that students will receive accurate information about the past. Moreover, books maintain a level of objectivity that is often lacking in the modern film industry. More specifically, authors are expected to provide factual information for readers, whereas films often sensationalize historical events to attract viewers. For these reasons, books about history will continue to play a significant role in education for years to come.

In conclusion, while films and TV shows provide an engaging introduction to history, they often prioritize entertainment over accuracy. Therefore, books will remain the primary source of serious historical knowledge in the near future.