Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about news. However, others believe that they can learn news more effectively through other media. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a heated debate revolving around people about reading news through newspapers or media. While doing both has its own benefits in the long run, I suppose getting informed about recent news more in traditional way is mentally and socially beneficial in technology advanced century.
Admittedly, there are some positive merits of using media programs like New-York Times and Guardian in modern world. In fact, newspapers were popular in past but there are not famous these days, mostly because they are now outdated for several factors and one of them is that the information provided in social medias are more detailed in depth and they use simple language for young. Past-newspapers were written in advanced language and involves too much pages, making it extremely difficult for language learners to read and learn.
It is prudently true that some people suggest reading newspapers and magazines in order to know about some current phenomenon for ordinary individuals. This is because there are some animated pictures and mental games including quizzes and math tests that are suitable for elderly society to spend time and more importantly for those who are much distracted by technology use. This is to say that when people are highly likely to use digital assets like phones and laptops for information, old people would have health problems related with their eyes for long-lasting screen use and eventually utilizing external engagements is indeed decreasing their eye-sight level. Therefore, learning about news by analyzing the pages of journals are efficient for those who struggle managing their social media platforms and elderly individuals whose health are not for high-tech use.
In conclusion, I assume that traditional approach is still important as it seems that it offers more opportunities for reader to read magazines in more focused way rather than using digital assets.
299 words 39 minutes
#IamOld
#EssayByMe
#task2
There is a heated debate revolving around people about reading news through newspapers or media. While doing both has its own benefits in the long run, I suppose getting informed about recent news more in traditional way is mentally and socially beneficial in technology advanced century.
Admittedly, there are some positive merits of using media programs like New-York Times and Guardian in modern world. In fact, newspapers were popular in past but there are not famous these days, mostly because they are now outdated for several factors and one of them is that the information provided in social medias are more detailed in depth and they use simple language for young. Past-newspapers were written in advanced language and involves too much pages, making it extremely difficult for language learners to read and learn.
It is prudently true that some people suggest reading newspapers and magazines in order to know about some current phenomenon for ordinary individuals. This is because there are some animated pictures and mental games including quizzes and math tests that are suitable for elderly society to spend time and more importantly for those who are much distracted by technology use. This is to say that when people are highly likely to use digital assets like phones and laptops for information, old people would have health problems related with their eyes for long-lasting screen use and eventually utilizing external engagements is indeed decreasing their eye-sight level. Therefore, learning about news by analyzing the pages of journals are efficient for those who struggle managing their social media platforms and elderly individuals whose health are not for high-tech use.
In conclusion, I assume that traditional approach is still important as it seems that it offers more opportunities for reader to read magazines in more focused way rather than using digital assets.
299 words 39 minutes
#IamOld
#EssayByMe
#task2