The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Although scientific knowledge has led to the tremendous advancement of human civilizations, some still question whether the main aim of science should be to change our lives for the better. I fully agree with this view, but still think that we should welcome other benefits that accompany the pursuit of scientific endeavors.
First and foremost, our increasing knowledge of the world brought a range of benefits to humankind that cannot be overlooked. Those include, among other things, food security, better living conditions, and longevity. Ranging from synthetic fertilizers that made it possible to feed today’s large world population to modern artificial intelligence algorithms that are taking over mundane tasks at work – all these scientific developments have helped people enormously to overcome their struggles and have better lives. If it were not for our curiosity to explore and learn about our surroundings, it would not have been possible for humans to make such progress.
Admittedly, one could be quick to point out other benefits of science which some mistakenly interpret as its ultimate goal. As a way of example, financial benefit and scientific contribution usually go hand in hand, as does fame. Scientists throughout history have been regarded highly, and most of them enjoyed a life of comfort if their contributions were of significance. Similarly, today’s best minds can expect to publish their books, win various grants and even receive the Nobel Prize along with its million-dollar prize as an acknowledgment of their contributions to science. However, it is important to remember that these are the byproducts of scientific progress, not the ultimate goal.
This becomes evident when we consider millions of science practitioners working tirelessly to resolve the mysteries of the world. Only a handful of Nobel laureates and other academy award winners come to the limelight and get large monetary compensations each year, but most scientists remain unknown and live a modest life. Although they have every right to be praised for their work and receive fair compensation, they mostly embark on these careers out of their desire to help fellow human beings.
In conclusion, I realize that scientists can and even should be well-respected and earn well. However, their main goal in doing research and exploring the world should be the public good.
375 words
#task2
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Although scientific knowledge has led to the tremendous advancement of human civilizations, some still question whether the main aim of science should be to change our lives for the better. I fully agree with this view, but still think that we should welcome other benefits that accompany the pursuit of scientific endeavors.
First and foremost, our increasing knowledge of the world brought a range of benefits to humankind that cannot be overlooked. Those include, among other things, food security, better living conditions, and longevity. Ranging from synthetic fertilizers that made it possible to feed today’s large world population to modern artificial intelligence algorithms that are taking over mundane tasks at work – all these scientific developments have helped people enormously to overcome their struggles and have better lives. If it were not for our curiosity to explore and learn about our surroundings, it would not have been possible for humans to make such progress.
Admittedly, one could be quick to point out other benefits of science which some mistakenly interpret as its ultimate goal. As a way of example, financial benefit and scientific contribution usually go hand in hand, as does fame. Scientists throughout history have been regarded highly, and most of them enjoyed a life of comfort if their contributions were of significance. Similarly, today’s best minds can expect to publish their books, win various grants and even receive the Nobel Prize along with its million-dollar prize as an acknowledgment of their contributions to science. However, it is important to remember that these are the byproducts of scientific progress, not the ultimate goal.
This becomes evident when we consider millions of science practitioners working tirelessly to resolve the mysteries of the world. Only a handful of Nobel laureates and other academy award winners come to the limelight and get large monetary compensations each year, but most scientists remain unknown and live a modest life. Although they have every right to be praised for their work and receive fair compensation, they mostly embark on these careers out of their desire to help fellow human beings.
In conclusion, I realize that scientists can and even should be well-respected and earn well. However, their main goal in doing research and exploring the world should be the public good.
375 words
#task2