UNCENSORED

People can sometimes be afraid of RATS, let alone dogs 😬😬😬.

Ohhh, as the GIF shows, country is in the safest hands 😅

Some of my students complained about me being so inactive on the channel, thereby contributing much less on their English proficiency.

#Quite_interesting...

The pie charts compare six different types of energy sources from which varying percentage of power was taken over 18-year period in a single nation.

Overall, it is clear that both in 1985 and 2003, oil was the main source of energy, whereas using other renewable power sources was hardly a favorable option in a country.

In 1985, a little more than half of all energy in a country was provided by oil reserves, with nuclear power stations being the second most common means of energy. While the latter made up 22% of total energy production, natural gases provided 13% of energy in a country, the ratio equivalent to those of coal, hydrogen, and other renewable sources combined.

In the following 18 years, using oil to generate electricity became much less common than it was in 1985, standing at 39%. One more noticeable alteration took place in the utilization of natural gas for energy generation, with an increase of 10-percentage-point by 2003. While nuclear energy lost its dominance, showing 17% of whole power production, coal usage rose by around 40% as that of 1985. Lastly, slightly more citizens started using other renewable energy sources, whereas hydrogen-based electricity had not gone through any change in its usage in 2003.

#Report_by_me

The line graph compares four different types of vehicles, namely buses, lorries, petrol cars, and diesel cars in terms of how much nitrogen oxide they emit in accordance with speed.

Overall, it is clear that diesel and petrol cars produce nearly the same amount of nitrogen oxide, with no significant correlation to speed. Buses and lorries also show similar trends, even though both emit varying amount of nitrogen oxide at different speeds.

At 10 kph, buses produce the maximum emissions of 40 g/km, while the equivalent figure is much less on other types of transit, making up around 33, 11, and 6 g/km for lorries, petrol and diesel cars, respectively. It is interesting to note that buses increase their emission production, after reaching a minimum of a little over 25 g/km at 60 kph. By contrast, the amount of nitrogen oxide emission continues to decrease on lorries until they are traveling at the speed of 90 kilometres per hour.

As for diesel and petrol cars, they both emit nearly the same amount of emission, no matter the speed they are travling at. Starting with 10 g/km emission at 10 kph, petrol car’s nitrogen oxide generation stays relatively stable, accounting for approximately 12 g/km emission when traveled at 130 kph. Diesel cars, however, slightly decrease their emission production from around 7 g/km at 10 kph to a mere 5 g/km at 130 kph.

#Report_by_me

The table shows the result of 4 decades of alterations made to one bakery business, Bobby’s Bakehouse precisely, illustrating the changes in the number of staff members as well as products available on sale.
 
Overall, there had been several noticeable changes to the bakeshop from 1930 to 1970, especially in the staff category. We can also see that after 40 years of improvements, more chains were opened both in the UK and throughout the US, with a brand of Bobby’s Bakehouse.
 
Upon closer examination of the table, it becomes evident that back in 1930, the bakery shop was nothing more than a little corner store, with only 2 workers selling breads and cakes. Within a mere 8 years, however, the number of staff working in the shop rose fivefold, with employees starting to sell muffins as well. The business itself wasn’t confined to a small place with so many new features, exposing itself to a much larger audience and buying specialised equipment to produce food.
 
In the following 5 to 12 years, the bakehouse business started seeking more modernised ways of preparing products, and thereby investing in technology and new equipment. The shop also established storage facilities, hiring people to distribute breads, cakes, muffins, tarts, biscuits, and pies to the customers. In addition, research into health and nutrition was initiated by the firm. Generally, 120 workers were employed in the shop as of 1950. Right after 20 years, this equivalent figure rose up to a whopping 3500 people working all over 16 chains in Britain and the United States. By contrast, the type of products sold in 1970 remained unchanged from that of 2 decades ago.

#Report_by_me

Nowadays, it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people’s recreation. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?


In today’s world, it has indeed become common for people to transfer marine animals from their natural waters to an artificial environment for a number of reasons, one of which is the entertainment of the public. Even though this development may be of significant help for some sea creatures, especially endangered ones, I believe that it is more likely to be detrimental considering the major selfishness behind people’s recreation.
 
On the one hand, there are a few benefits associated with the relocation of ocean animals to artificial habitats, foremost of which relates to ocean life preservation. Such sea creatures as whales and sea turtles are becoming extremely rare due in part to climate change as well as increasing poaching worldwide. Moving them to much safer locations, like amusement parks, can help keep those animals numbers in control, thereby ensuring ecological balance. From a scientific perspective, conservation of animals that are on the verge of extinction may serve as a means for scientists to study such ocean creatures and thus keep people well-informed of them. Because of these primary reasons, transit of ocean life from their marine habitat to non-natural places can be seen as advantageous.
 
Nevertheless, no matter the privileges of relocating animals in the sea, the overall impact of this trend is a bit more controversial. In other words, not every sea life can handle different climates, struggling to adapt to the climatic conditions of a particular region in the long term. For instance, if an animal is moved from tropical regions to a dry one, the challenges associated with adaptation may present unprecedented outcomes, or at worst, even death. On top of that, sacrificing ocean species’ comfort for the sake of entertainment of individuals can be seen as totally selfish. Instead of creating a discomfort for sea animals, people can watch NatGeo or many other such TV series in order to entertain themselves, eliminating the need for the amusement parks.
 
In conclusion, the potential drawbacks of the given development are likely to far exceed its possible advantages, as amusing oneself at the cost of sacrificing animals well-being is not worth attempting.

#Essay_by_me
#Ocean
#Entertainment

Eid is a time of joy, reflection, and celebration, marking the culmination of the holy month of Ramadan. It’s a time to cherish the blessings of togetherness, gratitude, and faith. Your dedication to observing Ramadan and your commitment to your beliefs are truly inspiring.

May this Eid bring you and your family abundant happiness, peace, and prosperity. May it strengthen the bonds of love and unity within your household and community☀️

Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on other planets is important. Others, however, think that it is a waste of public money because there are much important issues requiring funding on our own planet. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.


Space exploration is indeed a controversial topic, as people often disagree on its importance to human beings. While advocates of space research think it is of high significance to look for extraterrestrial life, critics state that the problems here on Earth have to be solved first using tax money before going beyond our own planet. Both views are discussed, and my personal opinion is also provided in the subsequent paragraphs.


To begin with, there are numerous reasons why some support the idea of investing money into outer space. A primary argument calling for space research and colonisation is the long-term survival of human civilisation and terrestrial life. By developing alternative locations off Earth, the planet’s species, including humans, could live on in the event of natural or human-made disasters on our own planet. Also, instinctive curiosity of man plays a part in the growing interest in a space, driving specialists to search for what is beyond our solar system. Educationally, learning more about other galaxies, or even possibly other universes, people can keep themselves well-informed of other beings, or what we call ‘aliens’. This, in turn, may offer unprecedented benefits in the future, one of which can be the significant advancement of technology.


Nevertheless, however promising future space exploration may be, it should be acknowledged that we first have to prioritise our contemporary issues on Earth. There are a number of problems that can be tackled with extra millions, one of which is healthcare. Even though many countries, like the US, hardly refrain from allocating taxpayer funds into space, worldwide healthcare is not available in those exactly the same nations, resulting in hundreds of avoidable deaths per year. Another plausible reason to suggest why some claim astronomical expenses of space research to be a waste relates to the lengthy period it takes. Building a spacecraft, sending it out of orbit, and exploring the space takes a considerable amount of time, during which other more important issues on Earth can be solved. 


In conclusion, while the search for extraterrestrial life may be of significant benefit in terms of education and colonisation of space, I firmly believe that taxes should primarily be used for the advantage of the citizens, with space research considered afterwards.


#Essay_by_me
#Space
#Galaxy.

It ain’t ur mansions in Dubai tho 😅

Guess what...

I've got a lesson at 6:30 am☠️

Ohh btw on my way to home, i saw a drunk person.

As he approached me wanting to talk, just decided to listen to him.

Though what he is doing is wrong, he is not as bad as most people expect.