#Writing
Parents care most about their children's future and tend to choose private school for their education. This leads to the question of whether these parents should pay taxes that is used to promote state schools or not. I personally believe that there should not be any financial privileges for parents of children in private schools because of difficulties involved, and potential inequality.
Calculating what percentage of taxes paid goes to the maintenance of public schools is an extra burden on economists. Income and property taxes are directed to a variety of sectors, ranging from schooling to military forces. This makes the process of deciding on the discount way more challenging if parents of children in private schools receive a reduction in taxes.
In addition, the fact that residents are not using the service they have been taxed on does not mean taxes must be reduced. This point can be easily proven with the example of the police, fire brigade and doctors, for whose salaries people pay taxes. Otherwise, some of the sectors in a country would collapse, leading to a nation weakening.
Moreover, a reduction in taxes in this case would create inequality in a society. Egalitarianism would be harmed in a community where the rich pay lower taxes than the middle-class and the poor just because their children are studying in better schools. This may even result in public outrage, as the majority of residents do not belong to the upper class in all countries across the world.
In conclusion, I argue that all people must pay the same amount of taxes no matter whether they use a certain service of the government or not. This argument holds for schooling too.
@Boburmirzo_English
Parents care most about their children's future and tend to choose private school for their education. This leads to the question of whether these parents should pay taxes that is used to promote state schools or not. I personally believe that there should not be any financial privileges for parents of children in private schools because of difficulties involved, and potential inequality.
Calculating what percentage of taxes paid goes to the maintenance of public schools is an extra burden on economists. Income and property taxes are directed to a variety of sectors, ranging from schooling to military forces. This makes the process of deciding on the discount way more challenging if parents of children in private schools receive a reduction in taxes.
In addition, the fact that residents are not using the service they have been taxed on does not mean taxes must be reduced. This point can be easily proven with the example of the police, fire brigade and doctors, for whose salaries people pay taxes. Otherwise, some of the sectors in a country would collapse, leading to a nation weakening.
Moreover, a reduction in taxes in this case would create inequality in a society. Egalitarianism would be harmed in a community where the rich pay lower taxes than the middle-class and the poor just because their children are studying in better schools. This may even result in public outrage, as the majority of residents do not belong to the upper class in all countries across the world.
In conclusion, I argue that all people must pay the same amount of taxes no matter whether they use a certain service of the government or not. This argument holds for schooling too.
@Boburmirzo_English