In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of parents who are choosing to educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a growing trend that, in some parts of the globe, children are being educated by their parents at home without going to school. In my opinion, there are a number of disadvantages to this development, such as a lack of teaching abilities in parents and insufficient time allocated by them, that can easily outweigh its benefits.
On the one hand, there are a couple of merits to this phenomenon. The most crucial benefit of parents educating their children is that this can create a strong bond between parents and their children. It is undoubtedly true that, nowadays, a lot of people are not able to spend time with their children. This may lead to some challenges in the relationship between them. For example, in western communities, it has already become common among adults not to live with their parents for several reasons, including a lack of mutual love and respect. However, if parents consider this matter from the beginning, in the future, there may be fewer cases related to separation between parents and children. In addition to the benefit for relationships in families, children can learn more easily from their parents. In other words, from a young age, children are likely to learn new information from their mothers, and they grow up considering their father a role model. In my view, if parental education replaces the traditional schooling method, children will not be unwilling to get an education even when they are teenagers.
Nevertheless, I tend to think that this development has many negative sides for children’s futures. One of the most significant reasons is that not all parents have enough knowledge to educate their children. This means that a lack of teaching skills may result in a poor academic background. Not only does it affect children’s future careers, but without proper education, people may not contribute to the development of their countries. Another reason why parents should not take the responsibility of teaching their children is time constraints. Most parents have a responsibility to make a living for their families. In this modern era, not only are males breadwinners in families, but women also tend to pursue a career. As a consequence, it might be difficult for both to invest a substantial amount of time in their children’s education.
In conclusion, despite the positives to parental education at home, including the enhancement of bonds and being more engaged in studying under parents’ control, I think these are outweighed by demerits ranging from parents’ inability to educate to a lack of time investment by parents. Therefore, schools are by far the best places for children to obtain knowledge.
#writingtask2
@xudoyberganov
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a growing trend that, in some parts of the globe, children are being educated by their parents at home without going to school. In my opinion, there are a number of disadvantages to this development, such as a lack of teaching abilities in parents and insufficient time allocated by them, that can easily outweigh its benefits.
On the one hand, there are a couple of merits to this phenomenon. The most crucial benefit of parents educating their children is that this can create a strong bond between parents and their children. It is undoubtedly true that, nowadays, a lot of people are not able to spend time with their children. This may lead to some challenges in the relationship between them. For example, in western communities, it has already become common among adults not to live with their parents for several reasons, including a lack of mutual love and respect. However, if parents consider this matter from the beginning, in the future, there may be fewer cases related to separation between parents and children. In addition to the benefit for relationships in families, children can learn more easily from their parents. In other words, from a young age, children are likely to learn new information from their mothers, and they grow up considering their father a role model. In my view, if parental education replaces the traditional schooling method, children will not be unwilling to get an education even when they are teenagers.
Nevertheless, I tend to think that this development has many negative sides for children’s futures. One of the most significant reasons is that not all parents have enough knowledge to educate their children. This means that a lack of teaching skills may result in a poor academic background. Not only does it affect children’s future careers, but without proper education, people may not contribute to the development of their countries. Another reason why parents should not take the responsibility of teaching their children is time constraints. Most parents have a responsibility to make a living for their families. In this modern era, not only are males breadwinners in families, but women also tend to pursue a career. As a consequence, it might be difficult for both to invest a substantial amount of time in their children’s education.
In conclusion, despite the positives to parental education at home, including the enhancement of bonds and being more engaged in studying under parents’ control, I think these are outweighed by demerits ranging from parents’ inability to educate to a lack of time investment by parents. Therefore, schools are by far the best places for children to obtain knowledge.
#writingtask2
@xudoyberganov