In today’s world full of conflicts and threats, maintaining safety among people is a top priority. Many individuals claim the government should invest more money in defense; however, they argue that the amount of funds allocated to public benefits should be restricted. In my opinion, while governments should spend money on defense, the funding allocated for societal benefits should also be increased for several reasons.
There are some reasons why I think the amount of money should be increased for defense. One of the prime reasons is external threats. Nowadays, there are many wars and conflicts among countries. They often argue with each other about export rates, political issues, or social circumstances, highlighting the crucial importance of defensive tools. Unless these conflicts are resolved peacefully, countries must strengthen their military power. As a result, governments may need to divert funds that could be used elsewhere, such as agriculture, education, and businesses. The more attention they pay to this field, the better results they are likely to achieve. Take Russia as an example. This country, located in both Europe and Asia, was one of the most powerful countries in the world. Over the years, it has improved its military capabilities to eliminate any threats. However, other sectors besides the military are not well-funded. Consequently, while Russia ranks second globally in terms of defense capabilities, its overall development in other sectors has suffered.
However, in my opinion, countries must not reduce the funding allocated to public welfare. First, they have to provide their residents with basic needs. For instance, in some countries, many people lack sufficient opportunities to make a living, as they may not have a future-promising job. If citizens do not have enough money to live better, it leads to negative consequences, such as increasing poverty rates and poor health. Additionally, countries also need to improve their education. That means if governments allocate funding to this field, they manage ti enhance economic growth as well. Therefore, people must have better knowledge in all spheres. Unless residents are well-educated, have enough chances to earn money, and have access to an advanced medical system, it is impossible to develop safety in the country. Take Japan, one of the most developed countries in the world, as an example. People in this country have great access to well-organized education, healthcare, culture, and other systems. The government mostly pays attention to meeting people’s basic needs and trying to eliminate any threat that can cause damage to their population. By considering these factors, spending more money on public welfare is vital.
In conclusion, most people suggest a great deal of money should be spent on defensive systems to maintain safety among people; however, they say that the government should lower the amount of funding for public benefits. In my opinion, it is important to address societal issues by improving resources.
There are some reasons why I think the amount of money should be increased for defense. One of the prime reasons is external threats. Nowadays, there are many wars and conflicts among countries. They often argue with each other about export rates, political issues, or social circumstances, highlighting the crucial importance of defensive tools. Unless these conflicts are resolved peacefully, countries must strengthen their military power. As a result, governments may need to divert funds that could be used elsewhere, such as agriculture, education, and businesses. The more attention they pay to this field, the better results they are likely to achieve. Take Russia as an example. This country, located in both Europe and Asia, was one of the most powerful countries in the world. Over the years, it has improved its military capabilities to eliminate any threats. However, other sectors besides the military are not well-funded. Consequently, while Russia ranks second globally in terms of defense capabilities, its overall development in other sectors has suffered.
However, in my opinion, countries must not reduce the funding allocated to public welfare. First, they have to provide their residents with basic needs. For instance, in some countries, many people lack sufficient opportunities to make a living, as they may not have a future-promising job. If citizens do not have enough money to live better, it leads to negative consequences, such as increasing poverty rates and poor health. Additionally, countries also need to improve their education. That means if governments allocate funding to this field, they manage ti enhance economic growth as well. Therefore, people must have better knowledge in all spheres. Unless residents are well-educated, have enough chances to earn money, and have access to an advanced medical system, it is impossible to develop safety in the country. Take Japan, one of the most developed countries in the world, as an example. People in this country have great access to well-organized education, healthcare, culture, and other systems. The government mostly pays attention to meeting people’s basic needs and trying to eliminate any threat that can cause damage to their population. By considering these factors, spending more money on public welfare is vital.
In conclusion, most people suggest a great deal of money should be spent on defensive systems to maintain safety among people; however, they say that the government should lower the amount of funding for public benefits. In my opinion, it is important to address societal issues by improving resources.