With technological advancements, it has become increasingly common to monitor people’s daily activities, irrespective of where they are, with the help of cellphone tracking and security cameras. While this trend poses some challenges—misusing information and limited freedom among the public, I believe it has more consequential advantages—improved security and lower crime rates with these unique mediums providing proofs.
Critics of such tools cite various reasons to support their stance. One of the significant factors contributing to this is that people’s personal information may be used inappropriately. This is because some experienced hackers can easily steal such information to gain popularity, likes, comments, and in turn, more income through social media sites such as Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. The loss of freedom in public areas is another disadvantage. When people are surrounded by surveillance cameras or drones, they can potentially feel uncomfortable, which can make it difficult for them to express themselves in a transparent way. Were it not for such observation tools, it would be much easier for people to do what they want and people would feel more relaxed in their daily lives, eliminating surrounding pressures.
Despite these arguments, I maintain that their advantages are far greater than their disadvantages. For one, governments can enhance public security using these tools. If criminals are conscious of the presence of such cameras, they may have difficulty in committing their criminal acts as they are feeling over hesitant or too cautious during missions. This may prevent them from lawbreaking in most of the cases. Moreover, they may play a pivotal role in identifying crimes. By checking databases from the cameras around the crime scene, officers can have a competitive advantage over wrongdoers. Such facts can also prevent wrong execution in the courts, with the criminals being evidenced by unmatched proofs such as photos, recordings and videos. Therefore, it can be justified that such tools do more good than harm to the individuals and the society as a whole.
In conclusion, although it presents some challenges including data insecurity and heightened inconvenience in public areas, I still believe it is more advantageous with the benefits ranging from better security and reduced crime rates.
362 words 7/7.5
@DIYORBEK1IELTS
#writing
#task2
Critics of such tools cite various reasons to support their stance. One of the significant factors contributing to this is that people’s personal information may be used inappropriately. This is because some experienced hackers can easily steal such information to gain popularity, likes, comments, and in turn, more income through social media sites such as Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. The loss of freedom in public areas is another disadvantage. When people are surrounded by surveillance cameras or drones, they can potentially feel uncomfortable, which can make it difficult for them to express themselves in a transparent way. Were it not for such observation tools, it would be much easier for people to do what they want and people would feel more relaxed in their daily lives, eliminating surrounding pressures.
Despite these arguments, I maintain that their advantages are far greater than their disadvantages. For one, governments can enhance public security using these tools. If criminals are conscious of the presence of such cameras, they may have difficulty in committing their criminal acts as they are feeling over hesitant or too cautious during missions. This may prevent them from lawbreaking in most of the cases. Moreover, they may play a pivotal role in identifying crimes. By checking databases from the cameras around the crime scene, officers can have a competitive advantage over wrongdoers. Such facts can also prevent wrong execution in the courts, with the criminals being evidenced by unmatched proofs such as photos, recordings and videos. Therefore, it can be justified that such tools do more good than harm to the individuals and the society as a whole.
In conclusion, although it presents some challenges including data insecurity and heightened inconvenience in public areas, I still believe it is more advantageous with the benefits ranging from better security and reduced crime rates.
362 words 7/7.5
@DIYORBEK1IELTS
#writing
#task2