Jakhongir Aliy | W 8.0 l S 7.5


Channel's geo and language: Uzbekistan, English
Category: Linguistics


Writing 8.0 | Speaking 7.5
IELTS instructor at Everest (Everest Mirzo Ulug'bek)

9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 [ short-term goal ]

Related channels  |  Similar channels

Channel's geo and language
Uzbekistan, English
Category
Linguistics
Statistics
Posts filter


Hey folks, how much does it cost to take an SAT exam?


1/4 of 2025 has already ended


🤡 ni 50 qilaylik shu postga😁


Meni essaylarimni doimiy o'qib yurganlar bilishadi o'z atrofimizdan real world examples topsa bo'lishini

Bugungi essayda ham ikkala example uchun ortiqcha qidirish olib borilmagan


Rostan tg guruhlarga har balo jo'natamizu to'g'rimi😁 ular ko'pincha chirib yotsayam example sifatida ishlayapti👀


This is one of the most, if not the most, task 2 topics i have ever seen, which means it is absolutely necessary for you to read and analyze such essays if you want to be well-prepared for your exam


Some people believe that governments should have access to people's mobile phone call records and messages for safety reasons. Others believe that this information is private and should not be available without permission. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.



With the widespread availability of modern technologies, such as mobile phones, the Internet, and social media, an increasing number of people have online communications and phone calls with others for various reasons. It is believed that government authorities should be given access to such conversations for security reasons, while there are people opposite to this notion, stating the view that such chats are highly personal and should be reached only with permission. Such surveillance may be pivotal for security purposes, but I still firmly believe that unrestricted access to online chats and phone call records can never be justified; instead, there should be certain legal frameworks that allow authorities to monitor suspicious conversations only.

On the one hand, governmental surveillance of online chats and phone call records can be important for the prevention of crimes, especially serious ones like terroristic attacks or drug traficcing. As online communication means enable people to connect with anyone, regardless of where they live, criminals, now, are capable of committing organized crimes on an unprecedented scale, controlling other members of their criminal network on a global scale. The terroristic and henious criminal act that happened in Moscow in 2024 could prove this, because this crime was orchestrated by terroristic organizations in the Middle East who recruited and trained killers through a well-known social media platform – Whatsapp. Therefore, if governments have access to digital records, they can detect and disrupt such potential threats.

On the other hand, monitoring online and phone communications can be considered as the violation of individual privacy. Conversations through modern technoliges, like the ones we have face-to-face, are highly personal, as people usually share their personal information and talk about their personal lives in these chats. For example, in Uzbekistan, it is very common for classmates, friends, families, and even relatives to create a common group on Telegram, a widely used app in this country, to stay connected with each other and not to lose their personal bonds. This means that overseeing digital communciations can infringe upon individual privacy, a fundamental human right, even if it is to maintain national security.

In my view, strict and transparent legal frameworks should be established so that we can ensure both the safety of the society and the protection of personal privacy. Such safety regulations should be in a form that grants governments access to highly suspicious conversations to prevent the potential for abuse, which is arguably the main reason why many people question the phenomenon of mass surveilance.

In conclusion, government surveillance of online chats and phone call records can enable us to maintain public safety as criminal activities can be detected and addressed before they are organized. Allowing for unrestricted access to such chats, however, can be a detrimental step towards disrupting personal freedom, which is a vital element of the modern and democratic world. I would propose that governments should have access to such data only under transparent and strict legal conditions. Not only would this approach help us take security measures, but it would also prevent the misuse of personal information.


#roadto9 #essayby@IELTSwithAliy #sharingiscaring

@IELTSwithAliy


Faqat 2 ta share👀

O'rtolar o'sha writingda qiynalyotgan guruhdosh qarindosh kursdoshlarga ulashvoraylik endi


Sizlar buni hayitlik qilib guruhlarga va tanishilarga tarqatib berolmaysilarmi👀. 500 bo'larmidik )

Sizlarni yordamilar doim juda ham significant bo'lgan




I will write an essay for the topic below and sent that essay as a gift:

​Some people believe that governments should have access to people's mobile phone call records and messages for safety reasons. Others believe that this information is private and should not be available without permission. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.


Bir-birimizga hayitlik beramizmi unda👀
and how degan savol ham bor though


Bayramlar bilan Kech bo'sayam

Bayramni iloji boricha eng yaqinlar bilan o'tkazish kerak btw


Aslida ko'chada svetafor yo'q joyda mashinaga yo'l berganimiz uchun ular bizga rahmat etishi kerak. Lekin bizda ozgina ularni kuttirib qo'ysez olayib qarab qo'yadi xuddi yo'lni xatlab olgandek


Let's go home


If you are great at what you're doing, it usually doesn't matter where you work or what you do, because people always seek great pros like you. This is a rule that has never changed and will never change, which means we need to try to be the best whether we are a farmer or an AI developer


When a tree falls, everyone hears the sound, but when a tree grows, noone hears it

308 0 2 10 16

To secure a band 7 in GRA, you are allowed to make some grammar mistakes as long as they do not affect the meaning. For example, even if you use "have" instead of "has", you can still reach a 7 in GRA. But if you want to get an 8+ in writing, keep in mind that it takes a lot of effort to go from a 7 to an 8 especially in terms of GRA


To get 8+ in GRA, you do not have to use «itam ko'rmagan» grammar structure whatsoever. Just read some well-written essays and you can learn what grammar structures are used to secure a high score in grammar.


Some people think the world will eventually have only one language.

Do you think the advantages of having one global language outweigh the disadvantages?
Since
today’s globalization has led to the dominance of particular languages, such as English, some languages are thought to be on the brink of extinction. It is, therefore, predicted that there will be only one language to use on a global scale in the future. Although this phenomenon can have certain benefits, I firmly believe that the disadvantages are far more significant.

On the one hand, the loss of language diversity can result in a loss of knowledge of past nations. Knowledge of people from different nations is all often written and preserved in their own native languages, potentially making us dependent on this particular language to gain knowledge about certain aspects of life. Therefore, if a particular language dies, knowledge in this language may also be lost, as was the case with the knowledge of ancient Egyptians. So far, no one has ever found a concluding and convincing argument about how the giant and marvelous pyramids in Egypt were built partly because no one knows the language of people in this ancient country.

On the other hand, having a single international language can accelerate scientific and societal development as a whole. Having only one global language can mean that, unlike today, any scientist, regardless of where they live, can read and benefit from any scientific texts, theories, and the results of new scientific studies and share their knowledge with their counterparts worldwide, paving the way for scientific breakthroughs and revolutionary inventions. Additionally, without today’s language barriers, business people can offer their products to anyone in the global market, and this can boost their financial situation and directly impact the economy of their society.

Despite this, I still contend that the drawbacks of a loss of linguistic diversity can far outweigh the benefits because this can result in the loss of cultural identity of nations. A language of a particular nation often evolves alongside their cultural beliefs, norms, and traditions, which means there can be a strong correlation between one’s native language and their cultural ties. This can be particularly concerning these days, as now, cultural homogenization, marginalizing one’s own culture, and following global trends instead are commonplace.

In conclusion, having a single global language can foster scientific and societal development because with the ability to understand each other, scientists from all over the globe can work collaboratively and businesses can also reach a global market. However, it cannot be ignored that the negative sides of a loss of linguistic heritage can make people unable to understand the knowledge gained by people in the past and pose cultural erosion, making me believe that the drawbacks of this phenomenon significantly more than the benefits.


#essayby@IELTSwithAliy #roadto9

20 last posts shown.