Kimningdir xotini boshqa bilan yurib ketganga oʻxshaydi. It's a question of gender equality everywhere. Even if a woman is a genius, even if her husband is a pig, she has to obey, they are saying.
p/s:
1. This term itself is used very wrongly here. Called gender equality, but it talks about women's rights. Either no one has looked at this term even on Wikipedia, or they do it on purpose to get more money from the West. Gender equality is the equality of all genders, according to which both male, female, gay, and pig (if s identifies them as pig, o.c.) are equal. But in our country, they chose this term to mean women's rights maybe because it sounds better than feminism.
2. The mistake in using the term is fine, but there is another mistake with comprehension. When talked about women's rights, everyone says that they are trying to achieve the dominance of women in society. It's ridiculous. How one gender can be superior to another in every aspect of society. If you look at the recent and distant past, you will see that even when men were dominant in almost all spheres of society, there were women leaders and women rulers, and this did not mean that the place of men in society was reduced to slavery and that society suffered because of female ruling. During the Arab invasion, Bukhara was ruled by a woman named Tugshada, but men fought in the battle. Or were women in command and were men busy making dolls for their daughters in their houses?
3. In Uzbekistan, women are truly underrated. Law supports them, government support them, western “propaganda” projects support them. However, public narratives do not. Social values do not. I do not want to offence anyone but I feel really sorry for girls who grew up with slavery mindset. Who had to give up their dreams. Who watched her childhood ambitions only on TV shows. Thatʻs why support needed to them.
4. Family is a matter of discussion. No dominant role in it. Those, who say no decision-making role for a woman in a family, should know that there is no decision-making role for a single person in any group. If a man makes mistake, partner has to edit. If a woman makes a mistake, partner has to edit. Then, it flowers. Thatʻs why in Uzbek it is called “umr yoʻldosh.” Instead of exchanging thoughts and discussing, if only one rules, governs, dictates, and decides, I see no difference in it from a stupid dictatorʼs country.
I am not expert, professor, researcher or lecturer, but that seems all I could write on this matter.
p/s:
1. This term itself is used very wrongly here. Called gender equality, but it talks about women's rights. Either no one has looked at this term even on Wikipedia, or they do it on purpose to get more money from the West. Gender equality is the equality of all genders, according to which both male, female, gay, and pig (if s identifies them as pig, o.c.) are equal. But in our country, they chose this term to mean women's rights maybe because it sounds better than feminism.
2. The mistake in using the term is fine, but there is another mistake with comprehension. When talked about women's rights, everyone says that they are trying to achieve the dominance of women in society. It's ridiculous. How one gender can be superior to another in every aspect of society. If you look at the recent and distant past, you will see that even when men were dominant in almost all spheres of society, there were women leaders and women rulers, and this did not mean that the place of men in society was reduced to slavery and that society suffered because of female ruling. During the Arab invasion, Bukhara was ruled by a woman named Tugshada, but men fought in the battle. Or were women in command and were men busy making dolls for their daughters in their houses?
3. In Uzbekistan, women are truly underrated. Law supports them, government support them, western “propaganda” projects support them. However, public narratives do not. Social values do not. I do not want to offence anyone but I feel really sorry for girls who grew up with slavery mindset. Who had to give up their dreams. Who watched her childhood ambitions only on TV shows. Thatʻs why support needed to them.
4. Family is a matter of discussion. No dominant role in it. Those, who say no decision-making role for a woman in a family, should know that there is no decision-making role for a single person in any group. If a man makes mistake, partner has to edit. If a woman makes a mistake, partner has to edit. Then, it flowers. Thatʻs why in Uzbek it is called “umr yoʻldosh.” Instead of exchanging thoughts and discussing, if only one rules, governs, dictates, and decides, I see no difference in it from a stupid dictatorʼs country.
I am not expert, professor, researcher or lecturer, but that seems all I could write on this matter.