Telegram channel "Alisher&Mukhammadali posts" — @alisherposts

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

11 Jan, 08:16

It is widely recognized that effective leadership requires a diverse set of qualities. While intelligence is often considered the most crucial attribute for a leader, I contend that while it plays an undeniable role, other traits, such as commitment and a positive outlook, are equally indispensable for successful leadership.

On the one hand, intelligence is undoubtedly vital in guiding a team toward achieving its goals. A key area where intelligence proves indispensable is decision-making, particularly in matters like recruitment and financial management. For instance, a leader needs to meticulously assess the background and capabilities of potential hires, as their performance and loyalty can determine the success or failure of the organization. Similarly, a well-thought-out financial decision, such as prioritizing debt repayment over discretionary spending, ensures the organization's stability and sustainability. Another domain where intelligence is paramount is long-term strategic planning. Leaders must analyze market trends, anticipate challenges, and devise strategies to maintain their competitive edge. Without high levels of intelligence, leaders risk making poor judgments that could jeopardize their organization’s future.

On the other hand, while intelligence is important, I believe that other qualities, such as dedication and positivity, are no less critical for effective leadership. Leaders who demonstrate commitment and go above and beyond their responsibilities set a strong example for their team. This fosters a culture of accountability and motivation, which directly contributes to higher productivity and team cohesion. Conversely, a lack of dedication from the leader may result in missed deadlines, dissatisfied clients, and a decline in organizational performance. Equally important is a leader’s ability to maintain a positive attitude. In a work environment often marked by challenges and conflicts, an optimistic leader can inspire their team, defuse tension, and instill a sense of resilience. By creating a supportive and encouraging atmosphere, leaders ensure that their team remains focused and united, even during difficult times.

In conclusion, while intelligence is undeniably an important quality for leaders, especially in making sound decisions and planning for the future, it is not the sole determinant of success. A strong sense of commitment and the ability to foster positivity are equally critical in shaping an effective leader. Only by combining these traits can leaders truly excel in their roles and drive their organizations toward long-term success.

Compare my response with that of ChatGPT's and highlight similarities/differences.

4.6k 0 57 14 86

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

11 Jan, 08:11

Intelligence is the most important factor for a leader.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is common knowledge that a good leader should possess a wide range of qualities to lead their team successfully. However, there is a view that the most prominent characteristic that makes a leader stand out is intelligence. While the part played by intelligence is undeniable for effective leadership, I would argue that it is not the most essential quality, for other personality traits are equally crucial.

On the one hand, intelligence is of course essential to guide a team to the right path. One aspect of the workplace where intelligence is vital is decision-making, particularly when recruitment and finances are concerned. For example, it is important to scrutinize a potential worker's background, since their fidelity to the executive and the company can determine the difference between success and failure. Similarly, a leader's insensible decision to purchase new equipment for office workers when credit payment due can damage the company's financial health, thereby putting the continuity of operations at risk. Another area where intelligence plays a key role is strategic planning for the future. Since leaders bear full responsibility for their businesses, careful analysis of current trends, and based upon them setting new goals is essential. Were it not for high intelligence of leaders, businesses run the risk of failing to keep up with their competitors and going bankrupt.

Nevertheless, the notion that being intelligent is the most essential quality for successful leadership is a downright overstatement in my view. If leaders are not willing to show commitment and go the extra mile, then they are not setting a good example for the rest of the team. This is likely to affect the team spirit, lowering internal drive in the company and hence productivity. Consequently, this laid back attitude can bring about lower output, unmet deadlines and dissatisfied customers, negatively impacting on the company reputation. Additionally, expecting leaders to adopt a positive mindset is extremely important. Since work is full of vicissitudes, conflicts and resentment, there should be someone who can cheer up the team and spread positive energy no matter what. This, in turn, serves as a boost in morale in times of difficulty and keeps the team on track.

In summary, leaders should be intelligent different reasons, ranging from effective decision-making and planning for the future. However, I am of the view that it is not the key to successful leadership, because demonstrating diligence together with adopting a positive frame of mind are no less important factors for company heads.

Possible band 8.0+

#task1 #mock_writing #agree_disagree #alisher_types #aGoodOne

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

4.4k 0 79 4 70

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

10 Jan, 20:52

02:18

Video is unavailable for watching

Show in Telegram

E46 Trailer - Kristina Mailova🎙

Stay tuned for the full release🔔

🌐Ad Astra🌐

#trailer

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

5.6k 0 12 14 67

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

10 Jan, 20:09

Forward from: Ad Astra School

#results #eight #alhamdulillah #2024 IDP CDI 29//December/2024 #twenty_five

Age: 17
Attempt: 2nd (1st-7)
Start point: A&M Program
Prep time w/ us: about 3 months
Teachers: Alisher&Mukhammadali

We also give no less credit to the student’s previous teachers.

Our destination is clear: TO THE STARS ⭐️

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

5.4k 0 18 21 79

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

10 Jan, 20:05

8️⃣🔤🔤

6.1k 0 1 4 78

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

10 Jan, 20:05

cooking time

5.9k 0 0 2 58

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

10 Jan, 08:11

The bar chart shows the amount of energy generated by wind in four countries from 1985 to 2000.

The bar chart demonstrates how much wind energy (in megawatts) was produced by four different countries - India, Denmark, Germany and the USA - between 1985 and 2000. Generally speaking, all the countries studied saw increases in their energy output from this source, with the US being a distinctive dominant in all years but 2000. The most significant change, however, was observed in Denmark, where the amount outstripped that of the US by the end.

From 1985 to 1990, the US obtained significantly more wind power than the other countries. Its quantity rose from about 1200 megawatts to a chart peak of 1600 megawatts during this period, which was roughly three times the figure for this closest follower Germany in each year. Reliance on wind as a power source in Denmark and India was even lower, yet similar, with the figures growing by more or less 200 units to just under 500-megawatt mark in 1990.

Thereafter, the trends shifted markedly. The dominance of the US came to a halt by the end of the period with 1500 megawatts, by which time Denmark had exhibited a precipitous rise to approximately 1600 megawatts, overtaking the US. Meanwhile, India also managed to treble its amount by the final year to around 1200 units, ranking third, whereas Germany's growth was consistently steady, thus ranking last with only about 900 megawatts.

19 min. Possible band 8.0+

#task1 #mock_writing #bar #alisher_types #aGoodOne

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

7.4k 0 199 20 104

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

9 Jan, 18:52

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWoL2HdgOQE

BTS - 2024 Rewind Video | Ad Astra Production

Get a glimpse into the making of the 2024 Rewind Video Wanna hear more from us? Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ad_astra_bukhara Telegram: https://t.me/alisherposts Telegram: https://t.me/ad_astra_school #ad_astra_school #2024_rewind #English #bukhara #uzbekistan #ielts #sat

7.1k 0 8 17 97

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

9 Jan, 08:11

Some people think that children should start school at a very early age, but others believe that they should not go to school until they are older.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

People hold differing opinions on the appropriate age for children to begin formal education. While some advocate for starting school at a very young age, others believe that delaying formal education until a child is older is more beneficial. Both perspectives have their merits, but I believe the decision should be tailored to the individual child’s physical, emotional, and cognitive readiness rather than adhering to a fixed age.

On the one hand, proponents of starting school early argue that it provides children with a head start in their academic journey. Early exposure to structured learning environments enables children to develop foundational skills, such as literacy and numeracy, at a younger age. This can also foster discipline and socialization, equipping children with the tools to adapt to the demands of higher education and competitive job markets. Furthermore, beginning education early may allow students to complete their studies sooner, giving them more time to explore extracurricular interests or start their careers earlier than their peers. For instance, students who start school at the age of four may graduate from university by their early twenties, offering them a significant advantage in a fast-paced world.

On the other hand, delaying formal education allows children to mature physically, emotionally, and cognitively before entering the academic system. Younger children may struggle to meet the demands of school due to their limited attention spans and underdeveloped motor skills. Prematurely introducing them to a structured environment could lead to frustration, low self-esteem, or even aversion to learning. For example, a five-year-old might find abstract mathematical concepts such as multiplication and division overwhelming, whereas a seven-year-old would be better equipped to grasp these ideas. This approach ensures that children are more confident and capable when they begin their educational journey.

In my opinion, the decision regarding the appropriate age to start school should not be universal but instead personalized based on the child’s developmental stage. Parents and early childhood educators play a crucial role in assessing a child’s readiness for formal education. Factors such as emotional resilience, cognitive ability, and social skills should be carefully considered to ensure a seamless transition into the schooling system. This individualized approach minimizes potential challenges and maximizes the child’s chances of thriving academically and personally.

In conclusion, while both early and delayed schooling have their advantages, a flexible and child-centric approach is the most effective. Parents and educators must collaborate to determine the optimal time for each child to start school, taking into account their unique developmental needs. This ensures that children embark on their academic journey at a time that aligns with their readiness, paving the way for long-term success.

POSSIBLE BAND 9.0 (refined by ChatGPT)

#task2 #classwork #discussion #alisher_types #aGoodOne

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

8.2k 0 197 24 156

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

7 Jan, 08:04

People are increasingly consuming organic food.

Why has this trend emerged?

Do you think organic food is worth the higher price?

More and more people choose to eat organic food these days. This phenomenon is driven by a series of recent trends, and I believe this type of food offers a good value for money even if it is less affordable.

One of the main reasons why people prefer to eat organic these days is the rise in individual income levels. Thanks to sustained economic prosperity in many countries around the globe, people can now afford to choose from organic food, which used to be accessible only to the affluent few. The trend towards consuming organic food is also closely associated with growing public awareness of environmental issues caused by modern farming practices such as excessive use of chemicals and fertilizers, causing soil degradation and water contamination. People believe they can do their part to counter these issues by opting out of mass-produced food items. Last but not least, social media has prompted a move toward eating organic for fitness and vitality. Organic food now receives a great deal of publicity because of bodybuilders and dieticians on social media making vlogs and blog posts about its benefits.

I believe the relatively high price of organic food is well-justified. Growing produce such as fruit and vegetables and other farm products organically is prohibitively expensive due to the labor and production costs involved. This type of food takes longer to grow without chemicals and synthetic fertilizers and requires labor-intensive care, adding to its retail price. Unless customers are willing to pay a premium, it is not financially viable for farmers to forsake their lucrative modern mass cultivation practices in favor of old ones. These costs are further increased by additional transportation and storage expenses, as organic food requires special conditions to maintain its quality.

In conclusion, while the reasons why a growing number of people prefer organic food range from rising income levels to environmental concerns, I consider that it is worth paying extra to enjoy chemical-free food, given high production costs.

#task2
329 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

10.1k 0 176 24 128

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

5 Jan, 20:36

Ep.46🎙

Guest: Kristina Mailova

Founder, Success
Bukhara PS educator

Expected runtime: ⁓ 2 hours

Stay tuned for the full release🔔

🌐Ad Astra🌐

#teaser

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

11.5k 0 12 32 64

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

5 Jan, 20:24

Comment below what kind of deals you'd like from us👇👇

10.4k 0 0 33 32

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

5 Jan, 20:23

I'm saddened to announce that our free help campaign is over😭

I hope you guys found it helpful and refreshing to have us guide you through your exam registration and prep🫡 🫡

11.1k 0 3 5 79

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

4 Jan, 08:03

Cyberbullying has become a major concern in recent years.

What problems does it create, and what measures can be taken to combat it?

More and more instances of online bullying are being seen these days, making it a cause for concern. While this issue has clear implications for people’s well-being and performance, it can be addressed with the help of involved parties such as social media companies.

One of the more worrying effects of cyberbullying is on one’s emotional well-being. Victims of cyberbullying often report experiencing feelings of depression, anxiety, and loneliness. These negative feelings, in turn, lead to loss of confidence and poor mental state, undermining their overall well-being and development. There are also some negative implications for people’s studies and work to bear in mind. Having been bullied online, people become inattentive and distracted, falling behind deadlines and assignments at work or school. Resultantly, they show poor academic results or low productivity, significantly reducing their attainment levels or income.

Several solutions can be put forth to counter cyberbullying and its implications, but few would be as effective as implementing improved safety measures online. Social media companies should closely monitor and supervise users’ accounts while imposing stringent anti-bullying policies such as punishing offenders with partial restriction or lifetime suspension in extreme cases. Another equally important remedy would be cautioning people against cyberbullying by raising their awareness and understanding of the consequences of this phenomenon. This can be done through educational talks by experts such as psychologists, therapy counselors, or victims who experienced this issue firsthand. Hearing from reliable sources, people are less likely to engage in acts of online bullying.

In conclusion, cyberbullying is a growing problem with clear repercussions on one’s emotional well-being and future prospects. Therefore, involved authorities should be quick to resolve it through online policing and increasing the public awareness of this woe.

#task2
285 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

14.7k 0 212 24 141

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

3 Jan, 19:59

https://youtube.com/shorts/Ajpx8NU2Bp8?si=oqH5Yz9ApsgfBWYg

Ep.45 - Parviz Tuksanov | BTS

#ad_astra_school #podcast #ielts #sat #uzbekistan #english

11.5k 0 8 9 66

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

3 Jan, 08:05

Some people think governments should provide free healthcare for all citizens.

Do you agree or disagree?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a policy?

It is suggested that all members of a nation should entitled to healthcare at no cost. I wholeheartedly agree with this proposal, and while there are numerous benefits of ensuring free access to healthcare for everyone, it also comes with some drawbacks worth considering.

I do concur with the idea of facilitating state-funded healthcare systems for everyone free of charge. The primary reason is the fact that people are already paying for healthcare through taxes. Most public hospitals and clinics are supported by public funds, which are maintained through taxation. Charging people again for these facilities seems unjust, so governments should be obliged to ensure free access to healthcare for all taxpayers. Besides, good health is a prerequisite to one’s future success, not just personally, but also professionally. People from less privileged backgrounds who cannot afford healthcare are at a disadvantage and less able to compete in the job market. This further widens the social gap, leading to a series of social problems such as discrimination and social unrest.

The proposed free healthcare for all policy has multiple benefits. Firstly, it adds to the contentment levels of nations. People tend to be happier and more fulfilled when they can enjoy good health and wellbeing. Allocating public funds to this end would be a step towards raising public happiness index; the happier a nation is, the more successful it is. Moreover, free healthcare improves public well-being. When the unwell constituents of a nation can seek medical attention at no charge, they can restore their health and return to work much quicker. This ensures that the country remains productive and experiences no major setbacks in production, making it economically prosperous.

It is essential to highlight some major shortcomings of having free access to healthcare universally. Initially, it is not financially viable for a country. There are only so many years a country can go without charging its citizens for healthcare since its funds would be depleted by an overwhelming demand. This can possibly drive the country bankrupt, creating a severe financial predicament and political chaos. Additionally, once free, healthcare services are likely to be exploited by citizens: too frequent medical check-ups and drug abuse are some instances. This brings about inefficiencies in the healthcare system, resulting in waste and poor management.

In conclusion, I am fully in favor of having the government pay for all medical expenses for its citizens, for they are mostly funded by taxes and good health is critical to leveling the playing field for workers. While the upsides of having such a policy range from higher happiness levels to sustained productivity, its downsides can be concerns over its financial viability and efficiency.

#task2
444 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️

12.7k 1 216 32 125

Alisher&Mukhammadali posts

2 Jan, 08:04

Some people believe that success in life depends on hard work, while others think it is determined by luck.

What are your views on this?

Which do you think is more important?

Opinions vary on what determines one’s success in life, hard work or luck. Both hard work and luck are essential to attaining success, but I personally believe the former plays a greater role in maximizing one’s chances of being successful.

The importance of hard work in achieving outstanding results is paramount. This is simply because one is often required to spend a great deal of time and effort to excel in their studies or job. Poor effort and insufficient time invested in one’s endeavors tend to lead to average outcomes, making them less successful than others. People of great stature such as Elon Musk and Cristiano Ronaldo often attribute their wins to their work ethic, which goes to show the role of hard work for success. Others ascribe success to luck or factors outside one’s control such as genetics, family circumstances, connections, and unexpected fortunate events. Someone with strong physical genetics stands a better chance of becoming an NBA player, just as an individual born to an affluent family is more likely to realize their business ideas than someone from humble origins.

In my personal view, if one is to succeed in life, they should place a greater emphasis on hard work. Success often necessitates that an individual be exceptionally good at their job, whether it is cooking or running a country. Excellence in one’s job usually comes from a considerable amount of learning and practice, which requires time and effort. As such, the more time and effort they expend on their craft, the more likely it is that they master it, ensuring their future success. Besides, luck is never guaranteed as it is elusive and often favors only a few. Relying on luck creates indifference, leading to inaction and complacency. Therefore, people who count more on luck than hard work usually make less effort and miss opportunities to increase their odds of success.

In conclusion, having brought hard work and luck into comparison in terms of their importance in one’s success, I am now more convinced that people should prioritize their work ethic over their luck to achieve desirable outcomes in life.

#task2
353 words, #classwork
#Mukhammadali_Issues

⚡️@alisherposts⚡️

⭐️@ad_astra_school⭐️