مُحَمَّد عَلِي | MATH MENTOR

⭐ Happy Chinese New Year!

Following the success of the Chinese startup DeepSeek, many are surprised at how quickly China has caught up with the US in AI. However, China’s progress in algorithmic efficiency hasn't come out of nothing. Chinese students have long outperformed others in math and programming at international olympiads 🏆

When it comes to producing outstanding performers in math and science, China's secondary education system is superior to that of the West. It fosters fierce competition among students, a principle borrowed from the highly efficient Soviet model 🎖

In contrast, most Western schools discourage competition, prohibiting public announcements of students' grades and rankings. The rationale is understandable — to protect students from pressure or ridicule. However, such measures also predictably demotivate the best students. Victory and defeat are two sides of the same coin. Eliminate the losers — and you eliminate the winners ☯️

For many students, motivation to excel in high school comes from treating it as a competitive game, striving to rank first against strong opponents. Removing transparency in student performance can make school feel meaningless for ambitious teenagers. It’s not surprising that many gifted kids now find competitive gaming more exciting than academics — at least in video games, they can see how each player ranks 😵

Telling all students they are champions, regardless of performance, may seem kind — until you consider how quickly reality will shatter this illusion after graduation. Reality, unlike well-meaning school policies, does have public grades and rankings — whether in sports, business, science, or technology. AI benchmarks that demonstrate DeepSeek's superiority are one of such public rankings. And more are coming. Unless the US secondary education system undergoes radical reform, China’s growing dominance in technology seems inevitable 🇨🇳

Тарифлар ошишидан энг кўп ўқитувчилар жабр кўришган, улар яна жабр кўришадими?

Агар ислоҳотлар антиислоҳотларга айланиб, фақат тариф ошириш ва таннарх шиширишдан иборат бўлиб қолмай, ресурсларни қайта тақсимлаш, хусусан энергетикани бюджетдан субсидиялашни қисқартириш ё тўхтатиш ва бўшаган маблағларни ижтимоий соҳага, биринчи навбатда ўқитуачилар маошини ўртачадан юқори суръатда оширишга йўналтирилганида, ўқитувчилар манфаатдор, табиийки кейинги қадамларни қўллаб-қувватловчи қатламга айланишган бўлишарди. Афсуски, амалда ғирт тескариси юз берди.

Тарифлар каррасига ошди, энергетикани субсидиялаш тўхтамади, шаффофлик ва ҳисобдорлик пайдо бўлмади, ўқитувчининг харажати нисбатдаям, мутлақдаям кескин ошди.

Даромадларга келганда индексациялаш жуда кечикди, майда ошган тарифларга нисбатан маошлар индексацияси октябрга келиб юз берди (амалда ноябрда олинган).

Бу хато апрелдаги навбатдаги ошди-ошди тўлқинида яна такрорланадими ё йўқми, ҳозирча аниқ бир гап айтиш қийин. Лекин аниқки, ўтган йилдаги каби иш тутилса, ўқитувчиларнинг нисбий ва амалда камбағаллашуви янада тезлашади.