Jakhongir Aliy | W 8.0 l S 7.5


Kanal geosi va tili: O‘zbekiston, Inglizcha


Writing 8.0 | Speaking 7.5
IELTS instructor at Everest (Everest Mirzo Ulug'bek)

9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 [ short-term goal ]

Связанные каналы  |  Похожие каналы

Kanal geosi va tili
O‘zbekiston, Inglizcha
Statistika
Postlar filtri


Can you share difficult yet interesting Task 2 topics in the comment section below?


fakernation👀


Bobirjon's Blog | IELTS 9 | SAT 1600 dan repost
The viral post claiming eight IELTS 8.0 scores in one day is completely photoshopped and intentionally misleading. The design misuses terminology (8.0 is not equivalent to C2), and even the date format (2024/2025) doesn’t match real IELTS documentation.

But let’s be clear — this is not just a minor technical mistake.

The core issue is that the center blatantly and maliciously lied in its advertisement.

The candidates didn’t receive their scores in one day — some results date back as far as November, meaning this post is a deliberate attempt to deceive. False advertising is not only unethical — it’s also illegal.

This so-called “largest language school in Uzbekistan” actually had only 6 authentic results in the past 5 months — not 8. To cover this underperformance, they resorted to misinformation, involving a popular blogger to lend credibility and manipulate public perception.

To make matters worse:
UzNews.uz, a platform that presents itself as a news outlet, published the post without basic fact-checking. Isn’t it a journalist’s duty to verify information before publication?
• A well-known blogger announced this as big news to thousands of followers without due diligence.

This isn’t a minor mistake. One result listed as 8.0 was in fact a 7.5, which was deliberately misrepresented. Another posted certificate doesn’t even appear in the IELTS verification system, indicating potential fabrication.

The post has since been quietly removed, but that’s not enough. If you lie publicly, you should also apologize publicly.

The public deserves transparency. IELTS candidates should stay alert and double-check all claims made by prep centers, especially those relying heavily on influencers or unverified or verified news sources.

I hold no personal grudge against InterNation. In fact, I’ve even spoken at an event in Tashkent on a Sunday. But this isn’t about rivalry — it’s about accountability.

Future IELTS takers — be wise. Choose institutions that are honest, not just popular.


no it's not
all those assignments can be perfectly done within 2 days


Is it too much👀?


meni IELTS guruhimga uyga topshiriq sifatida beradiganlarim👀
1. reading 2 ta passage (cambridge 8 test 1) 3 marta oqish + 30-40 ta yangi so'z
2. reading passageni bajarish + articleni oqish
3. darsda qilingan listening audiosini scriptga qarab eshitish+xatolarni qayta analiz qilib chiqish + script va savoldagi so'zlarni moslash
4. listening strategeies kitobidan 5 bet qilib kelish! keyingi safar endi oldim hali omadim kabi gaplar bo'lmasin iltimos
5. speaking tayyorlanish yaxshilab
6.1 ta task 1 yozib kelish
7. tashlangan videolarni korish yoki uzunligi ular bilan bir xil video/podcast korib kelish
8. bergan listening qogozim

160 0 1 11 13

1/4 of 2025 has already ended


🤡 ni 50 qilaylik shu postga😁


Meni essaylarimni doimiy o'qib yurganlar bilishadi o'z atrofimizdan real world examples topsa bo'lishini

Bugungi essayda ham ikkala example uchun ortiqcha qidirish olib borilmagan


Rostan tg guruhlarga har balo jo'natamizu to'g'rimi😁 ular ko'pincha chirib yotsayam example sifatida ishlayapti👀


This is one of the most, if not the most, task 2 topics i have ever seen, which means it is absolutely necessary for you to read and analyze such essays if you want to be well-prepared for your exam


Some people believe that governments should have access to people's mobile phone call records and messages for safety reasons. Others believe that this information is private and should not be available without permission. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.



With the widespread availability of modern technologies, such as mobile phones, the Internet, and social media, an increasing number of people have online communications and phone calls with others for various reasons. It is believed that government authorities should be given access to such conversations for security reasons, while there are people opposite to this notion, stating the view that such chats are highly personal and should be reached only with permission. Such surveillance may be pivotal for security purposes, but I still firmly believe that unrestricted access to online chats and phone call records can never be justified; instead, there should be certain legal frameworks that allow authorities to monitor suspicious conversations only.

On the one hand, governmental surveillance of online chats and phone call records can be important for the prevention of crimes, especially serious ones like terroristic attacks or drug traficcing. As online communication means enable people to connect with anyone, regardless of where they live, criminals, now, are capable of committing organized crimes on an unprecedented scale, controlling other members of their criminal network on a global scale. The terroristic and henious criminal act that happened in Moscow in 2024 could prove this, because this crime was orchestrated by terroristic organizations in the Middle East who recruited and trained killers through a well-known social media platform – Whatsapp. Therefore, if governments have access to digital records, they can detect and disrupt such potential threats.

On the other hand, monitoring online and phone communications can be considered as the violation of individual privacy. Conversations through modern technoliges, like the ones we have face-to-face, are highly personal, as people usually share their personal information and talk about their personal lives in these chats. For example, in Uzbekistan, it is very common for classmates, friends, families, and even relatives to create a common group on Telegram, a widely used app in this country, to stay connected with each other and not to lose their personal bonds. This means that overseeing digital communciations can infringe upon individual privacy, a fundamental human right, even if it is to maintain national security.

In my view, strict and transparent legal frameworks should be established so that we can ensure both the safety of the society and the protection of personal privacy. Such safety regulations should be in a form that grants governments access to highly suspicious conversations to prevent the potential for abuse, which is arguably the main reason why many people question the phenomenon of mass surveilance.

In conclusion, government surveillance of online chats and phone call records can enable us to maintain public safety as criminal activities can be detected and addressed before they are organized. Allowing for unrestricted access to such chats, however, can be a detrimental step towards disrupting personal freedom, which is a vital element of the modern and democratic world. I would propose that governments should have access to such data only under transparent and strict legal conditions. Not only would this approach help us take security measures, but it would also prevent the misuse of personal information.


#roadto9 #essayby@IELTSwithAliy #sharingiscaring

@IELTSwithAliy


Faqat 2 ta share👀

O'rtolar o'sha writingda qiynalyotgan guruhdosh qarindosh kursdoshlarga ulashvoraylik endi


Sizlar buni hayitlik qilib guruhlarga va tanishilarga tarqatib berolmaysilarmi👀. 500 bo'larmidik )

Sizlarni yordamilar doim juda ham significant bo'lgan




I will write an essay for the topic below and sent that essay as a gift:

​Some people believe that governments should have access to people's mobile phone call records and messages for safety reasons. Others believe that this information is private and should not be available without permission. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.


Bir-birimizga hayitlik beramizmi unda👀
and how degan savol ham bor though


Bayramlar bilan Kech bo'sayam

Bayramni iloji boricha eng yaqinlar bilan o'tkazish kerak btw


Aslida ko'chada svetafor yo'q joyda mashinaga yo'l berganimiz uchun ular bizga rahmat etishi kerak. Lekin bizda ozgina ularni kuttirib qo'ysez olayib qarab qo'yadi xuddi yo'lni xatlab olgandek


Let's go home

20 ta oxirgi post ko‘rsatilgan.